mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: akepner@sgi.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	grundler@parisc-linux.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, jes@sgi.com,
	randy.dunlap@oracle.com, rdreier@cisco.com,
	James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] dma: passing "attributes" to dma_map_* routines
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:50:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4767FA62.9060002@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071218001758.GO21916@sgi.com>

akepner@sgi.com wrote:
> Waaay back in October I sent some patches for passing additional 
> attributes to the dma_map_* routines:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119137949604365&w=2

Do I understand correctly?:  A device and the CPUs communicate via two
separate memory areas:  A data buffer and a status FIFO.  The NUMA
interconnect may reorder accesses of the device to the areas.  (Write
accesses?  Read accesses?  Both?)

To ensure synchronization between device and CPUs, you want to mark a
memory area which is to be dma-mapped with a flag which says:  "Writes
to the memory region will cause in-flight DMA to be flushed".  Whose
writes?  A write access from the device or a write access from a CPU?
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== ==-- =--=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-18 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-18  0:17 akepner
2007-12-18 16:50 ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2007-12-18 19:04   ` Roland Dreier
2007-12-18 20:07   ` akepner
2007-12-18 20:59     ` Stefan Richter
2007-12-18 21:09       ` Roland Dreier
2007-12-20 18:51       ` akepner
2007-12-20 19:06       ` akepner
2007-12-20 20:56     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-12-21 18:00       ` akepner
2007-12-21 20:24         ` Stefan Richter
2007-12-21 21:31         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4767FA62.9060002@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=akepner@sgi.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=jes@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®