From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] Guest kernel hangs in smp kvm for older kernels prior to tsc sync cleanup
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:19:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4768FE27.7020305@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4768BB43.1000609@qumranet.com>
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>>> While the change mentions that it fixes a time warp bug, it also says
>>> it should be rare. So clearly kvm smp tsc handing is buggy.
>>> Ingo/Thomas, (or anybody else), do you have any insight as to what kvm
>>> can be doing wrong to trigger this behavior?
>>>
>>>
>> hm. Those time warps were really small, due to the small imperfections
>> in the "sync up all CPUs to the same moment and do a WRMSR to clear all
>> their TSCs" mechanism. I.e. at most a few usec time warps. I really dont
>> know how that should result in udevd hanging. Can you debug udevd in any
>> way?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Adding debug didn't help. I'll try some sysrq keys to see what the
> guest thinks is happening.
>
>
many udev children are exiting; udevd itself is sleeping:
> udevd S D5DCDF24 2924 573 372 594 629 535 (NOTLB)
> d5dcdf38 00000086 00000002 d5dcdf24 d5dcdf20 00000000 d5dcdefc
> d6169f68
> d7db7f68 d5dcdf68 00000001 d5dd7560 c13b8a90 749ae8d2 00000002
> 000326a1
> d5dd7684 c131c700 00000003 d74f8900 892d6946 00000402 ffffffff
> 00000000
> Call Trace:
> [<c060d2c9>] do_nanosleep+0x3b/0x66
> [<c0439b20>] hrtimer_nanosleep+0x50/0x106
> [<c04397ee>] hrtimer_wakeup+0x0/0x18
> [<c0439c1f>] sys_nanosleep+0x49/0x59
> [<c0404e4c>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> [<c0600000>] xfrm_state_find+0x49f/0x51e
So likely sleeping is screwed up somehow (though only on smp).
>> so the only thing that KVM might be doing incorrectly here is the
>> emulation of the WRMSR that clears the TSC of each vcpu?
>>
>>
>
> By inspection, it is correct. Of course I may be missing something, so
> I'll write a unit test for it. It should also be much slower than the
> native wrmsr.
>
>
Testing shows wrmsr and rdtsc function normally.
I'll try pinning the vcpus to cpus and see if that helps.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-19 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-18 17:20 Avi Kivity
2007-12-18 22:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-19 6:33 ` Avi Kivity
2007-12-19 11:19 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2007-12-19 11:39 ` [kvm-devel] " Avi Kivity
2007-12-19 14:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-19 14:27 ` Avi Kivity
2007-12-19 15:32 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-19 15:41 ` Avi Kivity
2007-12-20 10:34 ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-12-19 16:55 ` Amit Shah
2007-12-19 17:04 ` [kvm-devel] Guest kernel hangs in smp kvm for older kernelsprior " Dor Laor
2007-12-19 17:09 ` Avi Kivity
2007-12-19 14:53 ` [kvm-devel] Guest kernel hangs in smp kvm for older kernels prior " Avi Kivity
2007-12-19 15:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-19 15:21 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4768FE27.7020305@qumranet.com \
--to=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome