From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
David Newall <david@davidnewall.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@myrealbox.com>,
John Reiser <jreiser@BitWagon.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, security@kernel.org
Subject: Re: /dev/urandom uses uninit bytes, leaks user data
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:43:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47699E82.5020503@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071218042337.GT7070@thunk.org>
Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 02:39:00PM +1030, David Newall wrote:
>> Thus, the entropy saved at shutdown can be known at boot-time. (You can
>> examine the saved entropy on disk.)
>>
>
> If you can examine the saved entropy on disk, you can also introduce a
> trojan horse kernel that logs all keystrokes and all generated entropy
> to the FBI carnivore server --- you can replace the gpg binary with
> one which ships copies of the session keys to the CIA --- and you can
> replace the freeswan server with one which generates emphermal keys by
> encrypting the current timestamp with a key known only by the NSA. So
> if the attacker has access to your disk between shutdown and boot up,
> you are *done*. /dev/random is the least of your worries.
>
> Really, why is it that people are so enamored about proposing these
> totally bogus scenarios? Yes, if you have direct physical access to
> your machine, you can compromise it. But there are far easier ways
> that such a vulnerability can be exploited, rather than making it easy
> to carry out an cryptoanalytic attack on /dev/random.
>
> (And yes, after using the saved state to load the entropy at
> boot-time, the saved state file is overwritten, and if you're
> paranoid, you can scrub the disk after it is read and mixed into the
> entropy pool. And yes, the saved state is *not* the entropy pool used
> during the previous boot, but entropy extracted using SHA-1 based
> CRNG.)
>
>>> If you have a server, the best thing you can do is use a hardware
>>> random number generator, if it exists. Fortunately a number of
>>> hardware platforms, such as IBM blades and Thinkpads, come with TPM
>>> modules that include hardware RNG's. That's ultimately the best way
>>> to solve these issues.
>> Just how random are they? Do they turn out to be quite predictable if
>> you're IBM?
>
> They use a noise diode, so they are as good as any other hardware
> random number generator. Of course, you ultimately have to trust the
> supplier of your hardware not to do something screwy, and Thinkpads
> are now made by Lenovo, which has caused some US Government types to
> get paranoid --- but that's why the best way to do things is to get
> entropy from as many places as possible, and mix it all into
> /dev/random. If any one of them is unknown to the attacker, he's stuck.
>
In another thread I believe I mentioned things an attacker can't know
(unless your system is already compromised) like fan speed, CPU
temperature, etc.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-19 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-14 19:34 John Reiser
2007-12-14 20:13 ` Matt Mackall
2007-12-14 20:45 ` John Reiser
2007-12-14 23:23 ` Theodore Tso
2007-12-15 0:30 ` John Reiser
2007-12-15 4:32 ` Theodore Tso
2007-12-17 16:30 ` John Reiser
2007-12-17 17:36 ` Theodore Tso
2007-12-18 0:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2007-12-18 3:05 ` Theodore Tso
2007-12-18 3:13 ` David Newall
2007-12-18 3:46 ` Theodore Tso
2007-12-18 4:09 ` David Newall
2007-12-18 4:23 ` Theodore Tso
2007-12-19 22:43 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2007-12-19 22:40 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-12-20 4:18 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2007-12-20 20:17 ` Phillip Susi
2007-12-21 16:10 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2007-12-22 1:14 ` Theodore Tso
2007-12-26 18:30 ` Phillip Susi
2007-12-20 20:36 ` Theodore Tso
2007-12-27 10:44 ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-18 5:12 ` David Schwartz
2007-12-17 20:59 ` David Schwartz
2007-12-15 7:13 ` Herbert Xu
2007-12-15 16:30 ` Matt Mackall
2007-12-17 17:28 ` Signed divides vs shifts (Re: [Security] /dev/urandom uses uninit bytes, leaks user data) Linus Torvalds
2007-12-17 17:48 ` Al Viro
2007-12-17 17:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-12-17 18:05 ` Ray Lee
2007-12-17 18:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-12-17 18:12 ` Ray Lee
2007-12-17 18:23 ` Al Viro
2007-12-17 18:28 ` [Security] Signed divides vs shifts (Re: " Linus Torvalds
2007-12-17 19:08 ` Al Viro
2007-12-15 7:20 /dev/urandom uses uninit bytes, leaks user data Matti Linnanvuori
2007-12-15 7:54 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-12-15 22:44 linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47699E82.5020503@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=david@davidnewall.com \
--cc=jreiser@BitWagon.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@myrealbox.com \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome