From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751564AbeEPTaq (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2018 15:30:46 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f180.google.com ([209.85.220.180]:44872 "EHLO mail-qk0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750858AbeEPTap (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2018 15:30:45 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpTKC3dsGHfTtNy5aX7LGMKj7If1jv/mqN1H5I43vkBhtXzFhkfBFw8Y/xrQI0j9Ui8I+TiYw== Subject: Re: [PATCH IB/core 2/2] IB/cm: Send authentic pkey in REQ msg and check eligibility of the pkeys To: =?UTF-8?Q?H=c3=a5kon_Bugge?= , Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Doug Ledford , Don Hiatt , Ira Weiny , Sean Hefty , OFED mailing list , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20180514210200.GN21531@ziepe.ca> <20180515190424.GL5615@ziepe.ca> <3E15B62F-E705-43BD-8A72-9E74F784D40E@oracle.com> <20180516151201.GA25661@ziepe.ca> <695ae613-931a-50ba-2b83-9d172e0ac2bc@dev.mellanox.co.il> <151B2A36-28F0-4A88-8633-31AE7E55F848@oracle.com> <20180516180115.GF25661@ziepe.ca> <20180516181655.GH25661@ziepe.ca> From: Hal Rosenstock Message-ID: <476dbacf-d02e-1bfa-35c7-aa5c743901ad@dev.mellanox.co.il> Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 15:30:42 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/16/2018 3:22 PM, HÃ¥kon Bugge wrote: > But, do we need an update to IBTA (that the BTH.PKey shall be that of the VM's Port)? Nothing in spec mentions shared (port) virtualization so that is an exercise completely left to the reader... Annex A19 is silent on this specific point but the virtual port model has virtual port partition table so there's no ambiguity there.