From: "Rojewski, Cezary" <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
To: "Pierre-Louis Bossart" <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
"Łukasz Majczak" <lma@semihalf.com>
Cc: "Marcin Wojtas" <mw@semihalf.com>,
"Liam Girdwood" <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
"Mateusz Gorski" <mateusz.gorski@linux.intel.com>,
"Radoslaw Biernacki" <rad@semihalf.com>,
"Alex Levin" <levinale@google.com>,
"Guenter Roeck" <groeck@google.com>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"Amadeusz Sławiński" <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Check the kcontrol against NULL
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 16:45:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4774f65a7f2f464781a45790c8934a62@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <371e612ac59c458cad1bafb82ca09c9f@intel.com>
On 2021-01-20 5:41 PM, Rojewski, Cezary wrote:
>
> Just checked the history behind this. And must say, I liked Ricardo's
> version better. Except for the "= {};" bit which Mark already pointed
> out - it should be a separate fix - it's simply more optional
Meant to say: optimal.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-20 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-10 12:14 [PATCH] " Lukasz Majczak
2020-12-10 15:55 ` Gorski, Mateusz
2020-12-11 15:42 ` Amadeusz Sławiński
2020-12-17 13:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Lukasz Majczak
2021-01-12 11:34 ` Łukasz Majczak
2021-01-20 15:49 ` Łukasz Majczak
2021-01-20 16:33 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-01-20 16:41 ` Rojewski, Cezary
2021-01-20 16:45 ` Rojewski, Cezary [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4774f65a7f2f464781a45790c8934a62@intel.com \
--to=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=groeck@google.com \
--cc=levinale@google.com \
--cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lma@semihalf.com \
--cc=mateusz.gorski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mw@semihalf.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rad@semihalf.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®