From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@goop.org>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <glommer@gmail.com>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00 of 10] x86: unify asm/pgtable.h
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 09:37:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4784A405.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <478424DE.3030609@goop.org>
>The "problem" is a BUG() in pageattr_64.c:change_page_attr(), which to
>me looks spurious. It arises because __PAGE_KERNEL_* doesn't contain
>_PAGE_GLOBAL, but PAGE_KERNEL_* does. When ioremap()
>change_page_attr(), it does so in a way that guarentees that the test
>
> if (pgprot_val(prot) != pgprot_val(ref_prot)) {
>
>in __change_page_attr() always succeeds. When I folded _PAGE_GLOBAL
>into the __PAGE_KERNEL_* definitions, it mostly works except it causes
>this if() to fail, falling into the otherwise dead else clause and
>triggers a BUG().
Indeed, and my patch version for fixing the ref-counting problem does
away with that (I don't recall whether Andi's version did, too):
if (!pgprot_match(prot, ref_prot)) {
if (!pte_huge(*kpte)) {
set_pte(kpte, pfn_pte(pfn, prot));
} else {
BUG_ON(!pgprot_match(old_prot, ref_prot));
kpte_page = split_large_page(address, prot, ref_prot);
if (!kpte_page)
return -ENOMEM;
set_pte(kpte, mk_pte(kpte_page, PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC));
}
if (pgprot_match(old_prot, ref_prot))
page_private(kpte_page)++;
} else if (!pgprot_match(ref_prot, old_prot)) {
BUG_ON(pte_huge(*kpte));
set_pte(kpte, pfn_pte(pfn, ref_prot));
BUG_ON(page_private(kpte_page) == 0);
page_private(kpte_page)--;
} else
return 0;
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-09 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-08 22:00 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:00 ` [PATCH 01 of 10] x86: move all asm/pgtable constants into one place Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:00 ` [PATCH 02 of 10] x86: avoid name conflict for Voyager leave_mm Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:00 ` [PATCH 03 of 10] x86/pgtable: unify pagetable accessors Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:00 ` [PATCH 04 of 10] x86: unify pgtable accessors which use supported_pte_mask Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:00 ` [PATCH 05 of 10] x86: page.h: make pte_t a union to always include pte element Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:00 ` [PATCH 06 of 10] x86/vmi: fix compilation as a result of pte_t changes Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:00 ` [PATCH 07 of 10] x86: pgtable: unify pte accessors Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:00 ` [PATCH 08 of 10] x86: unify zero_page definition Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:00 ` [PATCH 09 of 10] x86: unify paravirt pagetable accessors Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:00 ` [PATCH 10 of 10] xen: mask out PWT too Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-09 9:17 ` Jan Beulich
2008-01-09 19:04 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 22:42 ` [PATCH 00 of 10] x86: unify asm/pgtable.h Ingo Molnar
2008-01-08 23:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-08 23:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-08 23:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-08 23:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-08 23:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 0:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 0:13 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-09 0:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 0:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 0:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 0:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 0:55 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-09 1:09 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-09 1:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 1:18 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-09 1:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 1:37 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-09 1:21 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-09 1:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 0:53 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-09 0:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 1:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-09 1:12 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-09 1:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 1:35 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-09 1:42 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-09 1:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-09 2:11 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-09 3:22 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-01-09 10:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 10:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-09 14:26 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-09 9:37 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2008-01-09 1:11 ` Andi Kleen
2008-01-09 0:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4784A405.76E4.0078.0@novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome