From: Jim Ramsay <jim.ramsay@gmail.com>
To: linux-usb-users@lists.sourceforge.net,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Possible bug in usb storage (2.6.11 kernel)
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 11:14:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4789af9e05090810142bd3531d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
I think I have found a possible bug:
In usb/storage/transport.c, the routine usb_stor_Bulk_transport (and
perhaps other releated routines as well) has the following in the
"DATA STAGE" (around line 1020 in my file):
result = usb_stor_bulk_transfer_sg(us, pipe,
srb->request_buffer, transfer_length,
srb->use_sg, &srb->resid);
This looks fine, except that there is no guarantee that
srb->request_buffer is page-aligned or cache-aligned, as is required
according to Documentation/DMA-API.txt
In fact, on my MIPS platform, I sometimes get odd hangs and panics
because the later call to "dma_map_single" on this buffer causes a
cache invalidation, and since this memory is not necessarily
cache-aligned, sometimes too much cache is invalidated, which causes
interesting (and annoying) memory corruptions. Usually I've seen it
change the 'request' pointer in us->current_urb to something slightly
different, or zero, depending on the system's mood, but I'm sure there
are other possible ugly side-effects of this.
The solution, as suggested by Documentation/DMA-API.txt is to ensure
that all buffers passed into dma_map_single are always cache-aligned
(or at least page-aligned).
I would suggest this should be fixed by using a new buffer allocated
by the usb storage layer and then copying the result back into the
srb->request_buffer.
I suppose the scsi code could be changed to guarantee that
srb->request_buffer is page-aligned or cache-aligned, but that seems
like the wrong solution for this bug.
Questions? Comments? Is this the right way to fix it?
--
Jim Ramsay
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
next reply other threads:[~2005-09-08 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-08 17:14 Jim Ramsay [this message]
2005-09-08 17:58 ` [Linux-usb-users] " Matthew Dharm
2005-09-08 19:52 ` Jim Ramsay
2005-09-08 20:28 ` Jim Ramsay
2005-09-08 20:40 ` Alan Stern
2005-09-27 13:38 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2005-09-27 14:21 ` Alan Stern
2005-09-27 14:46 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2005-09-27 15:38 ` Alan Stern
2005-09-28 16:27 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2005-09-30 16:48 ` Ralf Baechle
2005-09-08 20:43 ` Matthew Dharm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4789af9e05090810142bd3531d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jim.ramsay@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-users@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome