From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758055AbYBJKq4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2008 05:46:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755940AbYBJKqq (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2008 05:46:46 -0500 Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:60292 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755593AbYBJKqp (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2008 05:46:45 -0500 X-Envelope-From: stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de Message-ID: <47AED5A0.8040003@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:44:48 +0100 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071216 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arjan van de Ven CC: Andrew Morton , Miles Lane , LKML , Nishanth Aravamudan , Adam Litke , David Gibson Subject: Re: 2.6.24-git20 -- BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/asm/uaccess_32.h:449 References: <20080209162643.fd3822f1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080209163812.704cf282@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <20080209163812.704cf282@laptopd505.fenrus.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 16:26:43 -0800 > Andrew Morton wrote: >> Guys, how often mut it be said? PLEASE always test all code with all >> kernel deubg options enabled. > > maybe we should make a CONFIG_KERNEL_DEVELOPER option that SELECTs the > various options that really should be on. > > If there is a chance of reasonable agreement on what those options are I'll cook > up a patch... There are a few in Documentation/SubmitChecklist items 12 and 15. > (but I don't want to get bogged down in a 500 mail flamewar about > CONFIG_FOO_BAR being right for this or not...) You can be rather sure that there will be at least... questions and concerns... ;-) Anyway, the root problem is that developers and integrators don't take time to follow the rules in SubmitChecklist. (I know that I still have ways to go to improve my own processes in that regard.) A Kconfig switch may raise awareness of SubmitChecklist a little bit, but I'm afraid it is not awareness what's the issue here. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- --=- -=-=- http://arcgraph.de/sr/