From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@student.ltu.se>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] kmemcheck v4
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:18:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47B4A208.7040407@cs.helsinki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47B49E39.7070904@gmail.com>
Vegard Nossum wrote:
> From 4ce1c09e38b2402dc04f0246916f3c23abe8f3e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:25:39 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] kmemcheck: make SLUB use kmemcheck
>
> With kmemcheck enabled, SLUB needs to do this:
>
> 1. Request twice as much memory as would normally be needed. The bottom
> half
> of the memory is what the user actually sees and uses; the upper half
> contains the so-called shadow memory, which stores the status of each
> byte
> in the bottom half, e.g. initialized or uninitialized.
> 2. Tell kmemcheck which parts of memory that should be marked
> uninitialized.
> There are actually a few more states, such as "not yet allocated" and
> "recently freed".
>
> If a slab cache is set up using the SLAB_NOTRACK flag, it will never return
> memory that can take page faults because of kmemcheck.
>
> If a slab cache is NOT set up using the SLAB_NOTRACK flag, callers can
> still
> request memory with the __GFP_NOTRACK flag. This does not prevent the page
> faults from occuring, however, but marks the object in question as being
> initialized so that no warnings will ever be produced for this object.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-14 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-14 19:59 [PATCH 1/4] " Vegard Nossum
2008-02-14 20:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] " Vegard Nossum
2008-02-14 20:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] " Vegard Nossum
2008-02-14 20:18 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2008-02-14 20:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] " Vegard Nossum
2008-02-14 20:12 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-02-14 20:31 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-02-14 21:49 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-15 19:18 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-02-14 20:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] " Pekka Enberg
2008-02-14 21:05 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47B4A208.7040407@cs.helsinki.fi \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ricknu-0@student.ltu.se \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome