From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, casey@schaufler-ca.com
Subject: [PATCH] (linus git 02/19/08) Smack update for file capabilities
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:03:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47BB4437.8020600@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Update the Smack LSM to allow the registration of the capability
"module" as a secondary LSM. Integrate the new hooks required for
file based capabilities.
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
---
security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.25-g0219-precap/Documentation/dontdiff linux-2.6.25-g0219-precap/security/smack/smack_lsm.c linux-2.6.25-g0219/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
--- linux-2.6.25-g0219-precap/security/smack/smack_lsm.c 2008-02-19 10:15:30.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.25-g0219/security/smack/smack_lsm.c 2008-02-19 09:24:19.000000000 -0800
@@ -584,14 +584,20 @@ static int smack_inode_getattr(struct vf
static int smack_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, char *name,
void *value, size_t size, int flags)
{
- if (!capable(CAP_MAC_ADMIN)) {
- if (strcmp(name, XATTR_NAME_SMACK) == 0 ||
- strcmp(name, XATTR_NAME_SMACKIPIN) == 0 ||
- strcmp(name, XATTR_NAME_SMACKIPOUT) == 0)
- return -EPERM;
- }
+ int rc = 0;
+
+ if (strcmp(name, XATTR_NAME_SMACK) == 0 ||
+ strcmp(name, XATTR_NAME_SMACKIPIN) == 0 ||
+ strcmp(name, XATTR_NAME_SMACKIPOUT) == 0) {
+ if (!capable(CAP_MAC_ADMIN))
+ rc = -EPERM;
+ } else
+ rc = cap_inode_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size, flags);
+
+ if (rc == 0)
+ rc = smk_curacc(smk_of_inode(dentry->d_inode), MAY_WRITE);
- return smk_curacc(smk_of_inode(dentry->d_inode), MAY_WRITE);
+ return rc;
}
/**
@@ -658,10 +664,20 @@ static int smack_inode_getxattr(struct d
*/
static int smack_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, char *name)
{
- if (strcmp(name, XATTR_NAME_SMACK) == 0 && !capable(CAP_MAC_ADMIN))
- return -EPERM;
+ int rc = 0;
- return smk_curacc(smk_of_inode(dentry->d_inode), MAY_WRITE);
+ if (strcmp(name, XATTR_NAME_SMACK) == 0 ||
+ strcmp(name, XATTR_NAME_SMACKIPIN) == 0 ||
+ strcmp(name, XATTR_NAME_SMACKIPOUT) == 0) {
+ if (!capable(CAP_MAC_ADMIN))
+ rc = -EPERM;
+ } else
+ rc = cap_inode_removexattr(dentry, name);
+
+ if (rc == 0)
+ rc = smk_curacc(smk_of_inode(dentry->d_inode), MAY_WRITE);
+
+ return rc;
}
/**
@@ -1016,7 +1032,12 @@ static void smack_task_getsecid(struct t
*/
static int smack_task_setnice(struct task_struct *p, int nice)
{
- return smk_curacc(p->security, MAY_WRITE);
+ int rc;
+
+ rc = cap_task_setnice(p, nice);
+ if (rc == 0)
+ rc = smk_curacc(p->security, MAY_WRITE);
+ return rc;
}
/**
@@ -1028,7 +1049,12 @@ static int smack_task_setnice(struct tas
*/
static int smack_task_setioprio(struct task_struct *p, int ioprio)
{
- return smk_curacc(p->security, MAY_WRITE);
+ int rc;
+
+ rc = cap_task_setioprio(p, ioprio);
+ if (rc == 0)
+ rc = smk_curacc(p->security, MAY_WRITE);
+ return rc;
}
/**
@@ -1053,7 +1079,12 @@ static int smack_task_getioprio(struct t
static int smack_task_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
struct sched_param *lp)
{
- return smk_curacc(p->security, MAY_WRITE);
+ int rc;
+
+ rc = cap_task_setscheduler(p, policy, lp);
+ if (rc == 0)
+ rc = smk_curacc(p->security, MAY_WRITE);
+ return rc;
}
/**
@@ -1093,6 +1124,11 @@ static int smack_task_movememory(struct
static int smack_task_kill(struct task_struct *p, struct siginfo *info,
int sig, u32 secid)
{
+ int rc;
+
+ rc = cap_task_kill(p, info, sig, secid);
+ if (rc != 0)
+ return rc;
/*
* Special cases where signals really ought to go through
* in spite of policy. Stephen Smalley suggests it may
@@ -1778,6 +1814,27 @@ static int smack_ipc_permission(struct k
return smk_curacc(isp, may);
}
+/* module stacking operations */
+
+/**
+ * smack_register_security - stack capability module
+ * @name: module name
+ * @ops: module operations - ignored
+ *
+ * Allow the capability module to register.
+ */
+static int smack_register_security(const char *name,
+ struct security_operations *ops)
+{
+ if (strcmp(name, "capability") != 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ printk(KERN_INFO "%s: Registering secondary module %s\n",
+ __func__, name);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/**
* smack_d_instantiate - Make sure the blob is correct on an inode
* @opt_dentry: unused
@@ -2412,6 +2469,8 @@ static struct security_operations smack_
.inode_post_setxattr = smack_inode_post_setxattr,
.inode_getxattr = smack_inode_getxattr,
.inode_removexattr = smack_inode_removexattr,
+ .inode_need_killpriv = cap_inode_need_killpriv,
+ .inode_killpriv = cap_inode_killpriv,
.inode_getsecurity = smack_inode_getsecurity,
.inode_setsecurity = smack_inode_setsecurity,
.inode_listsecurity = smack_inode_listsecurity,
@@ -2471,6 +2530,8 @@ static struct security_operations smack_
.netlink_send = cap_netlink_send,
.netlink_recv = cap_netlink_recv,
+ .register_security = smack_register_security,
+
.d_instantiate = smack_d_instantiate,
.getprocattr = smack_getprocattr,
next reply other threads:[~2008-02-20 3:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-19 21:03 Casey Schaufler [this message]
2008-02-20 17:50 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-02-20 20:03 ` Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47BB4437.8020600@schaufler-ca.com \
--to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome