From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: "Kristian Høgsberg" <krh@bitplanet.net>
Cc: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Jarod Wilson <jwilson@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] firewire: fix crash in automatic module unloading
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:16:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47CC326D.3070604@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59ad55d30803030845n419ac813kaa99e5ee7657dc52@mail.gmail.com>
Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> I would want to use a kref and a completion for tracking this though
> instead of the atomic. Just use kref_get() instead of incrementing
> the atomic and use kref_put() instead of decrementing it. The release
> function for kref_put() should complete the completion struct and
> instead of the busy loop in fw_core_remove_card() we just wait for the
> completion.
Sounds like the way to go. Since I already passed that patch upwards, I
will do an incremental rework. (But perhaps not before spending some
time on ticket number 9617 at bugzilla.kernel.org's...)
> And I'm not sure I agree that it's a device_count, it
> really just is a ref-count. The core should also hold a reference to
> the card and release it in fw_core_remove_card(), just before waiting
> on the completion.
Right; we just shouldn't mix fw-ohci's refcounting (which isn't really
needed since the lifetime rules for the card are as simple as they can
get for fw-ohci) and fw-core's refcounting.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- --== ---==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-03 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-24 17:56 [PATCH 0/5] firewire: fix crashes in workqueue jobs Stefan Richter
2008-02-24 17:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] firewire: invalid pointers used in fw_card_bm_work Stefan Richter
2008-02-24 17:59 ` [PATCH 2/5] firewire: fix crash in automatic module unloading Stefan Richter
2008-03-03 16:45 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2008-03-03 17:16 ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2008-03-03 17:37 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2008-02-24 17:59 ` [PATCH 3/5] firewire: remove superfluous reference counting Stefan Richter
2008-02-24 18:00 ` [PATCH 4/5] firewire: fw-sbp2: fix " Stefan Richter
2008-02-24 18:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] firewire: refactor fw_unit " Stefan Richter
2008-03-01 5:17 ` [PATCH 0/5] firewire: fix crashes in workqueue jobs Jarod Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47CC326D.3070604@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=jwilson@redhat.com \
--cc=krh@bitplanet.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®