From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.cjdns.fr (mail.cjdns.fr [5.135.140.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEC1C224253; Thu, 1 May 2025 23:28:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=5.135.140.105 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746142137; cv=none; b=EsoxmkUN6vlMtVb7g0FZ8WuF2krL2I6kSs+Ooj2U6RI6/tlaXt7WVPGX7vgh+rJSXA0fHBS69MNZjW0gwx+SAnZX1L45efHbd+ZryEtmxs3ZPocmN67ot3tQ6vZAFpSyH/ZGlE4AVdrewYlS6jdgwaYqlHoD3sqGk7lNVhQJrbE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746142137; c=relaxed/simple; bh=p7fQDBwKEOcAhP8WL8RWsj0IlpjWdHFNxvJgQ/mzSkY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=AeyZv/X8C5jYkjpN0UvjacDxpk7J/Rv9K0ImBy5O0DOhZMfkP8sXmZ4Tu8tqn19Ve+6q7dedBpQ5Nx46FIVAyqIvLs/fNL4jWbIK2SM+pQaF1PJAT03aYd7ZOvBrCV0dhDZvsp8rpZUiOv/Yz/8DfHVPEm0/3/tAM3mTsBIglEM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cjdns.fr; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=cjdns.fr; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cjdns.fr header.i=@cjdns.fr header.b=KQHA7qqr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=5.135.140.105 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cjdns.fr Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=cjdns.fr Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cjdns.fr header.i=@cjdns.fr header.b="KQHA7qqr" Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 1BFCFA11FA; Fri, 2 May 2025 01:28:42 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cjdns.fr; s=dkim; t=1746142126; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:references; bh=SSd/d4oY5sG6sC71AfIyUCv5ZFIzJDqINK1IEBxHgyM=; b=KQHA7qqrzWIoGBrgdbwVBkhPFK6dFDJdgj9AlXCRn4K4Ipu1O7Le9kptGyv4IeoPOsCzo7 vmfzOwn6zpV+kBRJ/f7JiZUEmAHOW5FRTovCRrFlNKaN+iNlUulFLKWVrEO+EUEbb56a45 fSvxcwe49iPADNHPLQtOyULMaxYy/DeTwvAwMQ+Rb/RIxLogV1x6bJUEK0T11MPZWUxZWf 7rYKVsxt/cOmvGrQ7EhP1qpSHeWf2Wbq5V8bqt0Q2SCtS9mhlZfynaezAdDvJAxVnRni4C /JSdfTsN+hl8rzDHIRe27bQu0nSXudRgnV6Dluuu5s0qHWbjUev7NhZji9YAYA== Message-ID: <47aae905-1a89-44aa-a31f-6cbfc0eb6726@cjdns.fr> Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 01:28:42 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] dt-bindings: timer: Add EcoNet EN751221 "HPT" CPU Timer To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, benjamin.larsson@genexis.eu, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org References: <20250430133433.22222-1-cjd@cjdns.fr> <20250430133433.22222-2-cjd@cjdns.fr> <20250501-ludicrous-idealistic-camel-7bf8aa@kuoka> Content-Language: en-US From: Caleb James DeLisle In-Reply-To: <20250501-ludicrous-idealistic-camel-7bf8aa@kuoka> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 On 01/05/2025 12:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 01:34:27PM GMT, Caleb James DeLisle wrote: >> Add device tree bindings for the so-called high-precision timer (HPT) >> in the EcoNet EN751221 SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Caleb James DeLisle >> --- >> .../bindings/timer/econet,en751221-timer.yaml | 80 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/econet,en751221-timer.yaml >> > What changed? Nothing explains dropping the tag. Sorry I lost track of it, I will re-send with it attached again. Thanks, Caleb > >
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process. > > It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it. > > If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new > versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless > patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT > bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you > on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no > need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer > will do that for tags received on the version they apply. > > Please read: > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577 > > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. >
> > Best regards, > Krzysztof > >