From: bigboy <snakky.zhang@gmail.com>
To: "Mikael Pettersson" <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How to active/validate the NPE-B NIC of intel_ixdp465?
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:15:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47ae62e20901121715l60a14201m8fa701b55035e0c9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18795.5822.969121.564217@harpo.it.uu.se>
Thanks for your kindly remind. :-)
Thanks
Xiao
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> wrote:
>
> bigboy writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have an Intel IXDP465 target with a NPE-B mezzanine card and that
> > was supported & validated with linux-2.6.21 + "Intel IXP400 Software
> > Access Library". And now the NPE ether net driver moved into the linux
> > baseline (drivers/net/arm/ixp4xx_eth.c) so I want to try it without
> > Intel's lib but failed. Here is my operations:
> >
> > Build the zImage with linux-2.6.28, I configure the kernel with
> > ixp4xx_defconfig and just change the IXP4XX_ETH to Y.
> >
> > Build the firmware for NPE-B:
> >
> > -) download the "Intel(R) IXP400 software - Access Library
> > (non-crypto)" to get the head file IxNpeMicrocode.h;
> >
> > -) download the "Intel IXP400 software - NPE microcode (non-crypto)",
> > both 2.4 and 3.0/3.0.1 version, unpack it and copy the head file
> > IxNpeMicrocode.h to its source code subdirectory;
> >
> > -) Edit the head file and comment out those macros for NPE-A and NPE-C
> > and just leave the one for NPE-B;
> >
> > -) Edit the IxNpeMicrocode.c and comment out line 25664, the 8 bytes
> > of "END OF IMAGE LIBRARY MARKER".
> >
> > -) "gcc ixNpeDlImageConverter.c" and get a a.out; run it and get the
> > firmware called IxNpeMicrocode.dat.
> >
> > -) Rename the IxNpeMicrocode.dat to NPE-B and copy it to the NFS
> > rootfs of the target in /lib/firmware.
> >
> >
> > There is a PCI E100 NIC and the linux kernel mount NFS rootfs through
> > it. The kernel can find two NICs related to NPE, eth1 for NPE-B and
> > eth2 for NPE-C. Then, I tried to active the NIC of NPE-B(eth1):
> >
> > -) "ifconfig eth1 hw ether 1234567890ab 192.168.1.1 netmask
> > 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255". With this I can see the driver
> > output "eht1: link up, speed 100 Mb/s, full duplex".
> >
> > -) Then "ping -I eth1 192.168.1.2". Then all I can get is "Destination
> > Host Unreachable" :-(
> >
> > With the firmware built with Microcode-V2.4, it can send up to 6
> > packages(get tx irq) and at last the "Link is down"; with the firmware
> > of V3.0, no package TX and at last the TX queue full and was
> > deactivated. With both of these firmware, no packages received.
> >
> > I wonder if there are anything wrong with my operations or if I need
> > some other special configurations/operations? Or any advises on
> > debugging that.
>
> You'd have better luck reaching the people in charge of this
> on the arm kernel mailing list, or possibly the netdev list.
>
> As I recall, the procedure for converting Intel's microcode .h
> file to something ixp4xx_eth wanted to load involved using a
> .h or .c file off the ixp4xx_eth driver's old web site.
> (I don't have the details handy.)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-13 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-12 9:37 bigboy
2009-01-12 10:09 ` Mikael Pettersson
2009-01-13 1:15 ` bigboy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47ae62e20901121715l60a14201m8fa701b55035e0c9@mail.gmail.com \
--to=snakky.zhang@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®