From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793105677; b=DMd6ihRdXZCUx2x2MhfW9dapZ+LIvIhIlKgsyORovfHoN+iZxLorE1ArBlBZ9hhCZhlQ +UcNI76wHyOz1HR4ZMQ7HrYTGW9E4deiJLYGSEfpWEcRUeR9VbVdzF+QkOcmhaBr0m4Do MhA4J8GC5oD7Yp3dCqOd5rWG4GgjeS3vLfY/T5okO0s9Sa5jSW3Brhzadot1nJfUq/uXy 3PEMzi+n8YKpz5NjWZeJBn9PSc2AcIWd5c5/JZZ0V6AdC0lgj/qmxpA1YDU3t0j5b9NIf 5nuyJCoIK4TGR1ys4MXKkTJ90b80Sb4/dxvhZ80n4BHJQ364lOJiWyXNiKA39o4pTnA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793105677; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject: Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition: In-Reply-To; bh=w2Eb4Z3/NENc4HHbZuUZ5NK5jd4aIWZeLoSJWD4efno=; b=EqNzpocql+z1LMZ3XDDBEihaEycAsXkAkhPJRqLWlFs5IScVkOttuSByy3/blO0lPzWV z0sxB7ijbrfwhIIu+/jQphOVSqRKfMb1x1oyt2aeV+jBPZpqPQcXn5Vpn+BGvjKY40Z4Q ExnvofiMVdrMKMW8v0ahiZcE43ex8s8PtAQQ5+fRjfnNVOph9eFKlWA+pJPon4FB4raw9 JVGxDJS9jpwYKKDkPZnFB+FzMpW/BBgcUY7VRb9tYrFfpJ2JHVwUmf9HitnrU23+I5hAm oupF6mvge/dRy8fxtRIHXGv+OrTdLrIroEA7FbyApRgx57/g+HCrM8BpumEpwV3djZQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20171124 header.b=K1eaZA8Y; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=156.67.10.101 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33880606A31A; Tue, 27 Oct 2026 12:54:35 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 33880606A31A Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20171124 header.b=K1eaZA8Y DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=w2Eb4Z3/NENc4HHbZuUZ5NK5jd4aIWZeLoSJWD4efno=; b=K1eaZA8YgTh9mhQnw0ZSCZX/0P JGrl9vy19ohl6MaRxt8V8woOuZ2qREY3C2u2XAsd63RjTNgS6DsiQvSv/Z14G1VSauBX2ZOhKPmwj KnlkQz/PrxdvRcSnWXGSrTcqZXu9voEI3iSV25sOL6h94kK+pSu6pCmivaLtDVHrbpF8=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1xLggy-00Cw3M-67; Tue, 27 Oct 2026 13:54:16 +0100 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 13:54:16 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Yongzhao Chen Cc: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Christian Marangi , Vladimir Oltean , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Russell King , Florian Fainelli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ziyang Huang Subject: Re: [PATCH net v7] net: dsa: qca8k: preserve port state across MTU changes Message-ID: <47e9713f-815e-4caf-8928-a7ec12d0087b@lunn.ch> References: <20261022155837.760-1-yongzhao.derek@gmail.com> <179268501671.3290.6623232109527554630@kernel.org> <20261027092718.266370-1-yongzhao.derek@gmail.com> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261027092718.266370-1-yongzhao.derek@gmail.com> On Tue, Oct 27, 2026 at 10:27:18AM +0100, Yongzhao Chen wrote: > On Thu, 22 Oct 2026 16:03:36 +0000 netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org wrote: > > - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during > > development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static > > analysis tool scan. > > The original problem was found during development, not in production. The point of these emails it to try to determine if the patch should go to net or net-next. Is this a real problem which bothers somebody? If it has not been seen in production, it sounds like it does not bother anybody. So net-next. Andrew