From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759378AbYDMQHY (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:07:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754146AbYDMQHM (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:07:12 -0400 Received: from smtp1.wifiinternet.cz ([89.31.47.1]:52146 "EHLO bor.wifiinternet.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751325AbYDMQHL (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:07:11 -0400 Message-ID: <48022A4C.8000601@seznam.cz> Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:44:12 +0200 From: Michal Simek Reply-To: monstr@seznam.cz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Likely CC: Stephen Neuendorffer , John Williams , jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, John Linn , git-dev@xilinx.com, git@xilinx.com, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org Subject: Re: Microblaze Linux release References: <48020A21.4000404@seznam.cz> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Grant, as I wrote. I am working on it. I'll send them ASAP. Michal >> Hi Everybody, >> >> I fixed all reported bugs which I got from LKML and from you. >> Latest version of Microblaze Linux kernel is available at git.monstr.eu. >> There is git repository called linux-microblaze.git >> Microblaze port is based on 2.6.24-rc5. I'll create the new repo with clean pack >> of changes based on latest kernel version for easier pull. >> >> Merge windows will be open hopefully next week and I would like to send pull >> request to Paul. >> >> I would like to ask you for review all microblaze code especially >> arch/microblaze and include/asm-microblaze. Please don't send me question to >> drivers - Microblaze will use only uartlite driver (only add on or to Kconfig - >> that's enough for now). > > Can you please also post your updated patch series? Reviewing patches > is easy. Reviewing a git tree is a lot more work. > > Thanks, > g. >