From: "Jesse Brandeburg" <jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com>
To: "Krzysztof Sierota" <Krzysztof.Sierota@firma.o2.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc6: irq 48: nobody cared
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:43:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4807377b0611161143m565f96e2g2bf2028347012ed5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200611161629.45149.Krzysztof.Sierota@firma.o2.pl>
On 11/16/06, Krzysztof Sierota <Krzysztof.Sierota@firma.o2.pl> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting the following in dmesg with 2.6.19-rc5 and 2.6.19-rc6 kernels quad
> opteron server running 64bit kernel, and the network card gets disabled.
>
> On identical server running 32bit kernel, same cards, same slots, same
> configuration running rc5 I see no errors.
>
> irq 48: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
its an e1000 adapter on irq 48
> 41: 579 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi eth2
> 42: 1482 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi eth3
> 47: 36323 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi eth4
> 48: 99905 10 83 2 IO-APIC-fasteoi eth5
got quite a few interrupts considering there are no link events in
your logs for eth4 or eth5
> ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x04] address[0xfec00000] gsi_base[0])
> IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 4, address 0xfec00000, GSI 0-23
> ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x09] address[0xfeafe000] gsi_base[40])
> IOAPIC[1]: apic_id 9, address 0xfeafe000, GSI 40-46
> ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x0a] address[0xfeaff000] gsi_base[47])
> IOAPIC[2]: apic_id 10, address 0xfeaff000, GSI 47-53
um, GSI 48 is the only interrupt using IOAPIC[2], could that be related?
> Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - version 7.2.9-k4-NAPI
> Copyright (c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation.
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] enabled at IRQ 19
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:00.0[A] -> Link [LNKD] -> GSI 19 (level, low) ->
> IRQ 19
> PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:02:00.0 to 64
> e1000: 0000:02:00.0: e1000_probe: (PCI Express:2.5Gb/s:32-bit)
> 00:15:17:0b:82:13
> e1000: eth0: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] enabled at IRQ 18
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:01:00.0[A] -> Link [LNKC] -> GSI 18 (level, low) ->
> IRQ 18
> PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:01:00.0 to 64
> e1000: 0000:01:00.0: e1000_probe: (PCI Express:2.5Gb/s:32-bit)
> 00:15:17:0b:81:ae
> e1000: eth1: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:06:02.0[A] -> GSI 41 (level, low) -> IRQ 41
> e1000: 0000:06:02.0: e1000_probe: (PCI-X:100MHz:64-bit) 00:04:23:b0:6b:6e
> e1000: eth2: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:06:02.1[B] -> GSI 42 (level, low) -> IRQ 42
> e1000: 0000:06:02.1: e1000_probe: (PCI-X:100MHz:64-bit) 00:04:23:b0:6b:6f
> e1000: eth3: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:05:03.0[A] -> GSI 47 (level, low) -> IRQ 47
> e1000: 0000:05:03.0: e1000_probe: (PCI-X:133MHz:64-bit) 00:30:48:57:3e:a0
> e1000: eth4: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
> ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:05:03.1[B] -> GSI 48 (level, low) -> IRQ 48
> e1000: 0000:05:03.1: e1000_probe: (PCI-X:133MHz:64-bit) 00:30:48:57:3e:a1
> e1000: eth5: e1000_probe: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection
how come you aren't bringing the interfaces up? At least I don't see
any link messages. We request the IRQ only at open. Something else is
causing interrupts on the e1000 devices' lines.
I suspect the IOAPIC code or ACPI code.
Jesse
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-16 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-16 15:29 Krzysztof Sierota
2006-11-16 19:43 ` Jesse Brandeburg [this message]
2006-11-16 21:55 ` Krzysztof Sierota (o2.pl/tlen.pl)
2006-11-16 21:07 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-16 22:38 ` Krzysztof Sierota (o2.pl/tlen.pl)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4807377b0611161143m565f96e2g2bf2028347012ed5@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com \
--cc=Krzysztof.Sierota@firma.o2.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®