From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1762234AbYDVS5a@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1762234AbYDVS5a (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:57:30 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1765332AbYDVSzC
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:55:02 -0400
Received: from h155.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:34179 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1765323AbYDVSy7 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:54:59 -0400
Message-ID: <480E345D.9090406@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:54:21 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
Organization: MontaVista Software Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803
X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en-gb
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
Cc: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
       Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
       Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] select ATA_SFF
References: <20080421213147.GH2633@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <480DE3C4.5@ru.mvista.com> <480DE6F5.8060403@gmail.com> <480DE9E8.2070809@ru.mvista.com> <480DEB1F.5060500@gmail.com> <480DF7B7.9030000@rtr.ca> <480DF876.7070800@gmail.com> <480DF9BD.1080104@rtr.ca> <480DFE76.8000809@ru.mvista.com>
In-Reply-To: <480DFE76.8000809@ru.mvista.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hello, I wrote:

>> I suppose.   If we were needlessly pedantic, then perhaps
>> the libata-bmdma.c should be renamed to libata-sff.c,

    It *was* renamed to libata-sff.c, back in 2006. :-)

>> and the libata-sff.c should be renamed libata-tf.c

    Not before splitting SFF-8038i stuff from it.

>> But there's probably been a document or two since then,
>> where the SFF folks have documented the TF interfaces, too.

>    Don't know, at least I haven't encountered such spec. Unless you mean 
> SFF-8020i (ATAPI CD-ROM spec).

    I've looked thru the list of their spec. and it didn't seem to have any 
about taskfile specifically. SFF-8070 (ATAPI CD-RW) refers to ATA/PI-4 for 
that matter.

MBR, Sergei