Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] mfd: omap-usb-host: Update DT clock binding information

[Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>]

On Wednesday 08 January 2014 15:39:36 Roger Quadros wrote:
> > What about the other clocks acquired in drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c? Shouldn't
> > all of those be provided by via the DT phandle?
> > 
> 
> All those clocks are identically named across the OMAP SoCs and are unique for each
> SoC, so providing DT phandle for all of them is not required.
> 
> The init_60m_fclk was renamed to l3init_60m_fclk in OMAP5, and hence the need for
> this binding.

What do you mean it was renamed? Is it a different version of the omap-usb-host
device then?

> > Should the clk_get be changed to of_clk_get()/of_clk_get_by_name() in the
> > driver? This would potentially remove the need of the init_60m_fclk name.
> > 
> 
> If we use of_clk_xxx() then we'll need to update DT nodes for OMAP4 and OMAP3 as
> well to explicitly provide the clock phandle. For now we make use of the fact that
> SoC clock data names the clock rightly i.e. "init_60m_fclk".

I'm getting the feeling that init_60m_fclk is not the name of the clock input
of the omap-usb-host device at all, but rather the name of a signal on the
omap soc, which would not be an appropriate identifier for the binding.

	Arnd