From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761621AbYDZTGH (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:06:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761484AbYDZTFw (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:05:52 -0400 Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:33268 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758998AbYDZTFw (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:05:52 -0400 X-Envelope-From: stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de Message-ID: <48137CF0.7090608@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 21:05:20 +0200 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080419 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Yinghai Lu , Yinghai Lu , jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org Subject: Re: [RFC git pull] "big box" x86 changes References: <20080426185516.GA32364@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20080426185516.GA32364@elte.hu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > x86: fix k8-bus_64.c build Is it not necessary to fold this into a previous patch, to keep the tree bisectable? -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- -=-- ==-=- http://arcgraph.de/sr/