mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
	hadi@cyberus.ca, tcw@tempest.prismnet.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
	Nivedita Singhvi <niv@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 08:27:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <481681441.1031732839@[10.10.2.3]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1d6rko9ab.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>

> Sounds about average for a P3.  I have pushed the full 800MiB/s out of
> a P3 processor to memory but it was a very optimized loop.  Is
> that 420MB/sec of IO on this test?

Yup, Fibre channel disks. So we know we can push at least that.

> Note quite.  But you suck at least 240MB/s of your memory bandwidth with
> DMA from disk, and then DMA to the nic.  Unless there is a highly
> cached component.  So I doubt you can effectively use more than 1 gige
> card, maybe 2.  And you have 8?

Nope, it's operating totally out of pagecache, there's no real disk 
IO to speak of.

> Wow the hardware designers really believed in over-subscription.
> If the busses are just running 64bit/33Mhz you are oversubscribed.
> And at 64bit/66Mhz the pci busses can easily swamp the system 
> 533*4 ~= 2128MB/s. 

Two 32bit buses (or maybe it was just one) and two 64bit buses,
all at 66MHz. Yes, the PCI buses can push more than the backplane,
but things are never perfectly balanced in reality, so I'd prefer
it that way around ... it's not a perfect system, but hey, it's
Intel hardware - this is high volume market, not real high end ;-)

> What kind of memory bandwidth does the system have, and on which
> bus are the memory controllers?  I'm just curious  

Memory controllers are hung off the interconnect, slightly difficult
to describe. Look for docs on the Intel profusion chipset, or I can
send you a powerpoint (yeah, yeah) presentation when I get into work
later today if you can't find it. Theoretical mem bandwidth should
be 1600MB/s if you're balanced across the CPUs, in practice I'd
expect to be able to push somewhat over 800Mb/s.

M.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-09-11 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-05 18:30 Troy Wilson
2002-09-05 20:59 ` jamal
2002-09-05 22:11   ` Troy Wilson
2002-09-05 22:39     ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-09-05 23:01       ` Dave Hansen
2002-09-05 22:48   ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-09-06  1:47     ` jamal
2002-09-06  3:38       ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-09-06  3:58         ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06  4:20           ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-09-06  4:17             ` David S. Miller
2002-09-07  0:05         ` Troy Wilson
2002-09-06  3:56       ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06  3:47   ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06  6:48     ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-06  6:51       ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06  7:36         ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-06  7:22           ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06  9:54             ` jamal
2002-09-06 14:29         ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-06 15:38           ` Dave Hansen
2002-09-06 16:11             ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-06 16:21             ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-09-06 15:29       ` Dave Hansen
2002-09-06 16:29         ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-06 17:36           ` Dave Hansen
2002-09-06 18:26             ` Andi Kleen
2002-09-06 18:31               ` John Levon
2002-09-06 18:33               ` Dave Hansen
2002-09-06 18:36                 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 18:45                   ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-06 18:43                     ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 19:19               ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-09-06 19:21                 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 19:45                   ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-09-06 19:26                 ` Andi Kleen
2002-09-06 19:24                   ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 19:45                 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-06 17:26       ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-09-06 17:37         ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 18:19           ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-09-06 18:26             ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-06 18:36               ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 18:51                 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-06 18:48                   ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 19:05                     ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-09-06 19:01                       ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 20:29                   ` Alan Cox
2002-09-06 18:34             ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 18:57               ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-09-06 18:58                 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 19:52                   ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-09-06 19:49                     ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 20:03                       ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-09-06 23:48       ` Troy Wilson
2002-09-11  9:11       ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-09-11 14:10         ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-11 15:06           ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-09-11 15:15             ` David S. Miller
2002-09-11 15:31               ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-09-11 15:27             ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2002-09-12  7:28     ` Todd Underwood
2002-09-12 12:30       ` jamal
2002-09-12 13:57         ` Todd Underwood
2002-09-12 14:11           ` Alan Cox
2002-09-12 14:41             ` todd-lkml
2002-09-12 23:12         ` David S. Miller
2002-09-13 21:59           ` todd-lkml
2002-09-13 22:04             ` David S. Miller
2002-09-15 20:16               ` jamal
2002-09-16  4:23                 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-16 14:16               ` todd-lkml
2002-09-16 19:52                 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-16 21:32                   ` todd-lkml
2002-09-16 21:29                     ` David S. Miller
2002-09-16 22:53                     ` David Woodhouse
2002-09-16 22:46                       ` David S. Miller
2002-09-16 23:03                       ` David Woodhouse
2002-09-16 23:08                         ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-16 23:02                           ` David S. Miller
2002-09-16 23:48                             ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-16 23:43                               ` David S. Miller
2002-09-17  0:01                                 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-17 10:31                   ` jamal
2002-09-13 22:12             ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-09-12 17:18       ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-09-06 23:56   ` Troy Wilson
2002-09-06 23:52     ` David S. Miller
2002-09-07  0:18     ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-09-07  0:27       ` Troy Wilson
2002-09-05 20:47 Feldman, Scott
2002-09-06 11:44 Robert Olsson
2002-09-06 14:37 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-06 15:38   ` Robert Olsson
2002-09-06 18:35 Manfred Spraul
2002-09-06 18:38 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 19:40   ` Manfred Spraul
2002-09-06 19:34     ` David S. Miller
2002-09-10 12:02       ` Robert Olsson
2002-09-10 16:55         ` Manfred Spraul
2002-09-11  7:46           ` Robert Olsson
2002-09-10 14:59 Mala Anand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='481681441.1031732839@[10.10.2.3]' \
    --to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=tcw@tempest.prismnet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®