From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934990AbYECBU1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 21:20:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761426AbYECBUO (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 21:20:14 -0400 Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:51629 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755587AbYECBUM (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 21:20:12 -0400 X-Envelope-From: stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de Message-ID: <481BBD84.10904@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 03:19:00 +0200 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080419 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, sfrench@us.ibm.com, swhiteho@redhat.com, jeff@garzik.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, drzeus-list@drzeus.cx, jack@ucw.cz, cbou@mail.ru, jens.axboe@oracle.com, ericvh@gmail.com, wim@iguana.be, chris@zankel.net, nico@cam.org, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, clameter@sgi.com, ezk@cs.sunysb.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next References: <20080502151206.b40f77ea.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080502154200.a6d8c43a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080502154200.a6d8c43a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 2 May 2008 15:12:06 -0700 > Andrew Morton wrote: > >> The first >> problem is working out "how the heck did that patch get into linux-next"? >> That would be much easier if the signoff trail was complete for git-based >> patches, but it often is not. > > doh. I'm pulling linux-next's constituent trees independently, so if I > spot a turd in linux-next I can just grep the various git trees to find out > where it came from. > > It seems wrong though... What about the committer info? Well, I suppose a nobody@localhost slips in, but more often I expect it to be something more telling than that. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- -=-= ---== http://arcgraph.de/sr/