From: Peter Oberparleiter <peter.oberparleiter@de.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net,
ltp-coverage@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] seq_file: add function to write binary data
Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 20:37:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4820A550.8090500@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080505213644.b153ee68.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 05 May 2008 17:24:37 +0200 Peter Oberparleiter <peter.oberparleiter@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Peter Oberparleiter <peter.oberparleiter@de.ibm.com>
>> Index: linux-2.6.26-rc1/fs/seq_file.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.26-rc1.orig/fs/seq_file.c
>> +++ linux-2.6.26-rc1/fs/seq_file.c
>> @@ -554,6 +554,18 @@ int seq_puts(struct seq_file *m, const c
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(seq_puts);
>>
>> +int seq_write(struct seq_file *m, const void *s, size_t len)
>
> Most of the other seq_file interface functions are nicely documented.
Documentation will be added with the next resend.
>> +{
>> + if (m->count + len < m->size) {
>
> Are you sure that shouldn't be >=?
If I understood seq_read() correctly, then < is correct:
m->count == m->size seems to be used as special marker for seq_read()
and >= doesn't make sense to me in this place. Also seq_printf() and
seq_puts() follow the same scheme.
>> + memcpy(m->buf + m->count, s, len);
>> + m->count += len;
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> + m->count = m->size;
>> + return -1;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(seq_write);
>
> Usually when a write-style function is passed too much data it will write
> as much as it can and will then return a smaller-than-requested value.
A write function in the context of the seq_file interface seems to be
defined more as an all-or-nothing business: user wants to read, buffer
is half-full, write is called, item doesn't fit, buffer is emptied,
write is called again, buffer doesn't fit, buffer size is doubled,
write is called again, etc.
> That's inappropriate for your application of seq_write(), but perhaps is
> appropriate for other future callers?
seq_write() is almost identical to the already existing seq_puts() which
led me to believe that it would fit the overall logic.
> This function has an upper limit of PAGE_SIZE bytes, I think? The covering
> documentation should explain such things.
seq_read() will double its internal buffer size if an item doesn't fit.
Regards,
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-06 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-05 15:24 Peter Oberparleiter
2008-05-06 4:36 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-06 18:37 ` Peter Oberparleiter [this message]
2008-05-07 20:17 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-05-07 20:45 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-05-08 7:42 ` Peter Oberparleiter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4820A550.8090500@de.ibm.com \
--to=peter.oberparleiter@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp-coverage@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome