From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752410Ab3F3UXp (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jun 2013 16:23:45 -0400 Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:46808 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752295Ab3F3UXl (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Jun 2013 16:23:41 -0400 X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu 0 pass X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu 0 pass X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu 0 pass X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu 0 pass X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu 0 pass X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu 0 pass X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu 0 pass X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu 0 pass X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu 0 pass X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu 0 pass X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu 0 pass X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu 0 pass X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu 0 pass X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu 0 pass X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu 0 pass X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.5+dev To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Sedat Dilek , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton , Tejun Heo , Daniel Vetter , Imre Deak , Lukas Czerner , Samuel Ortiz , Wensong Zhang , Simon Horman , Julian Anastasov , Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 28 [ BISECTED: rsyslog/imklog: High CPU usage ] In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 30 Jun 2013 20:19:45 +0200." <20130630181945.GA5171@redhat.com> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <20130630181945.GA5171@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1372623427_4671P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 16:17:07 -0400 Message-ID: <4823.1372623427@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1372623427_4671P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 20:19:45 +0200, Oleg Nesterov said: > > Not only "__wait_no_timeout(tout) ?:" was wrong, I didn't bother > to recheck this logic even after I got the "warning: the omitted > middle operand in ?:" reports. > > Sedat, thanks you very much! Any chance you can try the patch below? I'm not Sedat, but I had the same problem with rsyslog going nuts, and I can confirm that the patch fixes the problem. (Had to hand-apply it, there was some difference of opinion regarding { } on an else) Feel free to toss on a Tested-By: if this becomes a separate commit... --==_Exmh_1372623427_4671P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iQIVAwUBUdCSQwdmEQWDXROgAQL5lBAAjtbkNdBAVuKWbG0wP6Nskb2L85CBvY5G zCmv7o7Fyb4ZyWufDl6cLVi26PsQnv2nZFxy3k1Ivh/0l5s+YPngjKplgUMl+mXD 0X0zuwDx4J2868/rqqIVh91aKMo/wYMAg8Bf6NUAI4hpdOAaj6jo2kfDWzKA/FsR h24/cPL40aHzwUwxW2QAB0HEp02jxEXxExmTpjWrCGT5fVgM+AXaTTuPDga5KzRp b5kgsbIg5pqR6sR4jrNKxWiyU+uWIL0aNwD/duI85v7wk/oWDFTe7YF21BpX787H OjySotC5I+Zj3fxQb773fB4iexhuPz1HcnCo3PJqpRam4JDnjNhGe+NeO+AiKn+d zMyUBzvb4ruuKzk/zeiEysFlGvz6mhPjUqpRqL4DilqDGvBs5qE/MTtseNh0jEJa 0vou3m7GfxoKob3LSYb+hQugvJOVbJgS+jyVD5YewVJOeyvcCVaGFVe/snzmHYy/ Wu+C4/cVQYKMjv2fem5Y7h2ZFvWEaylqeDKwwtrDzXs3CX08YdbV90gXRF5TkPmK 8nKV+n2qUiG1qvDN3lwfWyxRBVEADEbkRfXHlsQcsx2A8zugbc+Rh/mFyW5zTIS7 l880+R8CKQIUaJMuQswoMd/cy2n9L26n2ZdMSa7Ef36NnMv3R/hLFEUwSaLHkBIT Xh1Dw+ee9m8= =8fz0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1372623427_4671P--