From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761927AbYENRb7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 13:31:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752226AbYENRbw (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 13:31:52 -0400 Received: from hp3.statik.tu-cottbus.de ([141.43.120.68]:45466 "EHLO hp3.statik.tu-cottbus.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751614AbYENRbw (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 13:31:52 -0400 Message-ID: <482B21B4.2030806@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 19:30:28 +0200 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rene Herman CC: Jonathan Corbet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Tracking and crediting bug reporters References: <4388.1210613272@vena.lwn.net> <4829AF7B.6040601@keyaccess.nl> In-Reply-To: <4829AF7B.6040601@keyaccess.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rene Herman wrote: > I must say the Bisected-by thing did feel a bit childish ("ah, I'm not > in it to get the bug fixed but to get my name mentioned!") but hey, I > find things to be offended over easily. From the example it does seem > you probably want both if you have one; if reporter, nailer-downer and > fixer are three seperate people. Which tag do I use for the postman who delivered the device which I needed for debugging? -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- -=-= -===- http://arcgraph.de/sr/