From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@igalia.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
kernel-dev@igalia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] x86/asm: move inline string functions to <asm/string_inline.h>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2026 20:57:17 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <482d866c513a0ada46b221602a0824f8@igalia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260530234840.GBaht3WL8L15zfNvBF@fat_crate.local>
On 2026-05-30 20:48, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 11:52:33AM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
>> In a future patch, 'boot/string.c' will include inline string functions.
>>
>> Using the header <asm/string.h> is problematic for a couple of reasons
>> (i.e., build errors), which can be addressed, but introduce unnecessary
>> complexity and regression risk (beyond these _found_ couple of reasons).
>>
>> Using a new header <asm/string_inline.h> is simpler and transparent to
>> existing users of <asm/string.h>, with less changes to 'boot/string.c'
>> and its users (eg 'boot/compressed/string.c' and 'purgatory/purgatory.ro'),
>> which minimize regression risk.
>>
>> No functional change intended.
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202605140922.q7IlUv7o-lkp@intel.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@igalia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
>>
>> ---
>> (*) Reasons not to include <asm/string.h> in 'boot/string.c':
>>
>> 1) 'boot/string.c' is built for 16-bit/real mode thus some type and word
>> size errors happen when <asm/string.h> include, e.g., <asm/string_64.h>.
>>
>> This can be addressed with '#ifndef _SETUP' (defined by 'boot/Makefile').
>>
>> 2) 'boot/string.c' is included by 'boot/compressed/string.c' which is
>> the source of 'purgatory/string.o', linked by 'purgatory/purgatory.ro'
>> (CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE).
>>
>> In 64BIT, <asm/string.h> includes <asm/string_64.h>, which references
>> __memset() and __memmove() with KCFI_REFERENCE(), ie, __ADDRESSABLE();
>> however, 'purgatory/purgatory.ro' is not linked with implementations.
>>
>> So, CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE and CONFIG_CFI without CONFIG_KASAN hit errors:
>>
>> >> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __memset
>> >>> referenced by string.c
>> >>> arch/x86/purgatory/purgatory.ro:\
>> (__UNIQUE_ID_addressable___memset_0)
>> --
>> >> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __memmove
>> >>> referenced by string.c
>> >>> arch/x86/purgatory/purgatory.ro:\
>> (__UNIQUE_ID_addressable___memmove_1)
>>
>> (Note: this is not hit with CONFIG_KASAN because 'boot/compressed/string.c'
>> adds aliases __memset()/__memmove() to memset()/memmove() in that case.)
>>
>> This can be addressed with 'CFLAGS_string.o := -D__DISABLE_EXPORTS' so to
>> disable KCFI_REFERENCE() in 'purgatory/Makefile' (it removes CC_FLAGS_CFI
>> anyway).
>>
>> ...
>>
>> However, since a change in this series would need more changes to address
>> errors it causes, it is reasonable to change the series not to cause them,
>> by using a separate header with _just_ inline string functions.
>
> This is very long-winded and it meanders across things. Write it more
> disciplined, please, and formulate it such that you're writing the commit
> message of a standalone patch. It should have merit on its own and not talk
> about future patches and so on.
>
> And yes, the intent to have a separate header which doesn't pull in
> nasty deps between decompressor and kernel proper, is ok.
>
> For that, we have arch/x86/include/asm/shared/ which contains functionality
> shared between the two objects so I think you should move it there. It'll also
> make it a "clean" header which contains solely this stuff and doesn't pull in
> any other shit.
Ack; thanks for the feedback and pointers, I'll take a look.
>
> Thx.
--
Mauricio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-30 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-26 14:52 [PATCH v4 0/4] x86/pvh: fix unbootable VMs again (PVH + KASAN) Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2026-05-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] x86/asm: move inline string functions to <asm/string_inline.h> Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2026-05-30 23:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-05-30 23:57 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira [this message]
2026-05-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] x86/asm, x86/boot: expose inline memcmp Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2026-05-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] x86/cpuid: fix unbootable VMs by really inlining memcmp() in hypervisor_cpuid_base() Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2026-05-26 14:52 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] x86/pvh: fix unbootable VMs by really inlining memset() in xen_prepare_pvh() Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2026-05-27 20:47 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] x86/pvh: fix unbootable VMs again (PVH + KASAN) Borislav Petkov
2026-05-30 18:25 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2026-05-30 22:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-05-30 23:01 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2026-05-30 23:02 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2026-06-01 18:04 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=482d866c513a0ada46b221602a0824f8@igalia.com \
--to=mfo@igalia.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome