From: Alex Elder <elder@riscstar.com>
To: bhelgaas@google.com
Cc: lizhi.hou@amd.com, herve.codina@bootlin.com,
andrea.porta@suse.com, daniel@riscstar.com,
mohdayaa@qti.qualcomm.com, lbiancon@qti.qualcomm.com,
mani@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] PCI: of: update endpoint ranges dynamically
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 07:41:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <484e967e-a8b3-438d-a2c2-2bcc45ff2ca1@riscstar.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910021919.3421449-1-elder@riscstar.com>
On 9/9/26 9:19 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
> A PCI endpoint bus is a devicetree construct that allows a PCI
> endpoint (function) to have sub-devices defined that are accessible
> in an SoC via the PCI endpoint's BARs. Such a bus is represented as
> a devicetree sub-node for a PCI function having the name "pci-ep-bus".
> There can be one or more pci-ep-bus nodes.
>
> A PCI function with a pci-ep-bus devicetree node must also define
> "#address-cells", "#size-cells", and "ranges" properties, to specify
> how endpoint bus addresses are translated to the PCI parent bus.
>
> An endpoint bus address has three cells; the first indicates which of
> the function's BARs the address is associated with, and the other two
> specify a 64-bit (2 cell) offset within the BAR's region.
>
> BAR base addresses are determined dynamically by the PCI enumeration
> process, so generally it's not possible to include them in a static
> devicetree file. When this addressing scheme was introduced, this
> was not a problem because the devicetree content was generated
> dynamically--after booting--based on the information (including BAR
> addresses) available following PCI enumeration.
>
> It is possible (and in some cases, necessary) to define the devicetree
> nodes that represent PCI devices ahead of time, in a statically-defined
> devicetree file. In order to support the PCI endpoint bus model in this
> case it is necessary to dynamically update the static devicetree so that
> the BAR base addresses assigned during enumeration are reflected in the
> endpoint's "ranges" property.
>
> This series implements that dynamic update, leveraging the same code
> used to create the "ranges" property when PCI_DYNAMIC_OF_NODES is
> enabled. The first patch makes an argument to of_pci_get_addr_flags()
> optional. The second patch separates the code that dynamically builds
> the property value into a helper function, and the last arranges for a
> statically-defined devicetree node for a PCI endpoint to have its
> "ranges" property updated (if it includes a "pci-ep-bus" sub-node)..
After some offline discussion, I have decided to slightly
change *when* the "ranges" property will be updated.
The Raspberry Pi RP1 device defines (statically) a ranges
property within the pci-ep-bus it uses. It maps BAR 1 to
a base address 0x40000000, size 0x00400000 range in its
parent endpoint's PCI address space.
For the original proposal, the ranges property is replaced
for any PCI endpoint devicetree node with a pci-ep-bus subnode.
Instead, I'd like to offer the option of defining a ranges
property that does not get replaced. This way, the Raspberry
Pi RP1 can continue to work as it does now.
An "empty" (no value) ranges property doesn't work for
pci-ep-bus, because it will treat the upper cell of the
parent base address as a PCI flags field; pci-ep-bus
instead uses that cell as a BAR number.
So I will be posting a new version of this series that differs
this way:
- In of_pci_make_dev_node(), if there is no existing device
tree node: no change (create a complete node dynamically)
- If there is a preexisting devicetree node but the current
device is a PCI bridge: no change (just return)
- If the device node in of_pci_make_dev_node() is not a bridge,
but there is no "pci-ep-bus" child node: no change (just return)
- (New) Look up the ranges property in the devicetree node for
the PCI endpoint device. If it is not "empty" (i.e., if it
has an assigned value, as would the Raspberry Pi RP1): just
return (do not change the ranges property value)
- OTHERWISE (empty or perhaps missing ranges property), call
of_pci_update_endpoint_node_ranges() to create a new ranges
property dynamically, which takes into account the assigned
BAR addresses for the PCI endpoint.
-Alex
> -Alex
>
> Note: this series is built upon these patches:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260908213459.2519059-1-elder@riscstar.com/
>
> The entire series (based on v7.3-rc2 and including those prerequisites)
> is available here:
> https://github.com/riscstar/linux/tree/outgoing/dynamic_ranges-v2
>
>
> Between version 1 and version 2:
> - Included the first patch (which was previously posted in a different
> series)
> - Modified the last patch so the ranges property is updated only for
> PCI endpoints having at least one "pci-ep-bus" node
> - Rebased on v7.3-rc2 (and the prerequisite series)
>
>
> Version 1 is available here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260813220717.1394644-1-elder@riscstar.com/
>
>
> Alex Elder (3):
> PCI: of: make a flags argument optional
> PCI: of: introduce of_pci_build_prop_ranges()
> PCI: of: introduce of_pci_update_endpoint_node_ranges()
>
> drivers/pci/of.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/pci/of_property.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> drivers/pci/pci.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 857c3561ea9f2c3107b5c6d830d3b3face159cbc
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 2:19 Alex Elder
2026-09-10 2:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: of: make a flags argument optional Alex Elder
2026-09-10 2:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] PCI: of: introduce of_pci_build_prop_ranges() Alex Elder
2026-09-10 2:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] PCI: of: introduce of_pci_update_endpoint_node_ranges() Alex Elder
2026-09-18 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] PCI: of: update endpoint ranges dynamically Alex Elder
2026-09-23 12:41 ` Alex Elder [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=484e967e-a8b3-438d-a2c2-2bcc45ff2ca1@riscstar.com \
--to=elder@riscstar.com \
--cc=andrea.porta@suse.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=daniel@riscstar.com \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=lbiancon@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizhi.hou@amd.com \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=mohdayaa@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®