Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> is the following really correct?
> e7bfd0a1a6c8f82977253dab19be9d9979c1ec1b
> 
> +	tristate "ebt: nflog support"
> +	depends on BRIDGE_NF_EBTABLES
> +	help
> +	  This option enables the nflog watcher, which allows to LOG
> +	  messages through the netfilter logging API, which can use
> +	  either the old LOG target, the old ULOG target or nfnetlink_log
> +	  as backend.
> +
> +	  This option adds the ulog watcher, that you can use in any rule
>                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> ulog watcher?

That appears to be a cut-and-paste error. I've queued this fix.