mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	broonie@kernel.org, bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com,
	oleksandr@natalenko.name
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 0/4] bfq: two fixes and one improvement related to I/O control
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 18:21:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4873FEA2-9E53-4C76-A6B9-4AC82CDC8E6E@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5ac17a9b-1c38-0664-15e3-ff75c9671388@kernel.dk>



> Il giorno 16 ago 2018, alle ore 21:10, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> ha scritto:
> 
> On 8/16/18 10:51 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>> Hi Jens,
>> 
>> while working a little bit on cgroups I/O control, I found two nasty
>> bugs in bfq. They break bandwidth control in simple configurations
>> with one-process groups. These bugs are fixed by the first two patches
>> in this series.
>> 
>> These fixes improved I/O control so much, that I could reduce the
>> write overcharge factor, used by bfq to counter write-induced
>> issues. This reduction is performed by the third patch.
>> 
>> The fourth patch contains a little code improvement I made in a
>> function that has to do with I/O control.
>> 
>> I hope we are still in time for 4.19.
> 
> Patches look fine to me. You are in fact several weeks late for 4.19, I
> need to have anything that's going in to 4.19 by -rc6 or -rc7 time
> (depending on whether we have an -rc8 or not). This is to ensure that it
> gets plenty of time in linux-next as well. I've queued up patches this
> time (since they were small), but please send them in in due time next
> time.
> 

Thanks for your patience. Next time I'll respect due time.

Paolo

> -- 
> Jens Axboe
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2018-08-17 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-16 16:51 Paolo Valente
2018-08-16 16:51 ` [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 1/4] block, bfq: readd missing reset of parent-entity service Paolo Valente
2018-08-16 16:51 ` [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 2/4] block, bfq: always update the budget of an entity when needed Paolo Valente
2018-08-16 16:51 ` [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 3/4] block, bfq: reduce write overcharge Paolo Valente
2018-08-16 16:51 ` [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 4/4] block, bfq: improve code of bfq_bfqq_charge_time Paolo Valente
2018-08-16 19:10 ` [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 0/4] bfq: two fixes and one improvement related to I/O control Jens Axboe
2018-08-17 16:21   ` Paolo Valente [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4873FEA2-9E53-4C76-A6B9-4AC82CDC8E6E@linaro.org \
    --to=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®