From: "Michael Evans" <mjevans1983@gmail.com>
To: "Michael J. Evans" <mjevans1983@comcast.net>
Cc: "Neil Brown" <neilb@suse.de>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2 1/1] md: Software Raid autodetect dev list not array
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 05:20:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4877c76c0708260520v33bc36bfu24e688a5902912e5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708260451.24868.mjevans1983@comcast.net>
Also, I forgot to mention, the reason I added the counters was mostly
for debugging. However they're also as useful in the same way that
listing the partitions when a new disk is added can be (in fact this
augments that and the existing messages the autodetect routines
provide).
As for using autodetect or not... the only way to skip it seems to be
compiling md's raid support as a module. I checked 2.6.22's
menuconfig and there's no way for me to explicitly turn it on or off
at compile time. I also feel that forcing the addition of a boot
parameter to de-activate a broken and deprecated system you aren't
even aware you are getting is somehow wrong. So if you have over 128
devices for it to scan, as I do on one of my PCs, then it can bring up
an array in degraded mode.
... crud.
I also just noticed, while looking to see if there was some existing
way of detecting if debugging were enabled and to be extra-verbose,
that I left in one of my other debugging variables by mistake.
i_found. Since it's signed, it must have been the variable I was using
to detect where my list matched the existing array in my initial
verification runs.
Are there any other things you'd like to see changed before I submit a
third patch version?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-26 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200708222058.45480.mjevans1983@comcast.net>
2007-08-24 3:37 ` [patch " Neil Brown
2007-08-24 5:50 ` Michael Evans
2007-08-26 11:51 ` [patch v2 " Michael J. Evans
2007-08-26 12:20 ` Michael Evans [this message]
2007-08-27 3:41 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-08-27 7:56 ` Michael Evans
2007-08-26 12:56 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-26 15:58 ` Michael Evans
2007-08-26 16:56 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-08-26 19:18 ` Michael Evans
2007-08-27 22:16 ` [patch v3 " Michael J. Evans
2007-08-27 22:30 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-08-28 4:38 ` Michael J. Evans
2007-08-28 4:46 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-08-28 13:08 ` Michael Evans
2007-08-28 13:14 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-28 13:26 ` Michael J. Evans
2007-08-28 13:24 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-08-28 13:32 ` Michael Evans
2007-08-28 16:15 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-08-28 17:10 ` Michael Evans
2007-08-28 17:22 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-08-28 19:11 ` Michael Evans
2007-08-28 19:16 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-08-29 8:06 ` [patch v5 " Michael J. Evans
2007-08-29 15:18 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-08-28 13:27 ` Michael J. Evans
2007-08-28 4:39 ` [patch v4 " Michael J. Evans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4877c76c0708260520v33bc36bfu24e688a5902912e5@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mjevans1983@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mjevans1983@comcast.net \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®