From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752100AbaGMVH2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jul 2014 17:07:28 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42041 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751747AbaGMVHU (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jul 2014 17:07:20 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <53BEA780.5050602@samsung.com> References: <53BEA780.5050602@samsung.com> <1404924054.14643.36.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com> <1403620852-16476-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <24144.1404919879@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <8975.1404932208@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <1404941347.14643.57.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com> To: Dmitry Kasatkin Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Mimi Zohar , keyrings , linux-security-module , linux-kernel , Josh Boyer , Matthew Garrett , Dmitry Kasatkin Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] ima: extending secure boot certificate chain of trust MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <487.1405285619.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 22:06:59 +0100 Message-ID: <488.1405285619@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dmitry Kasatkin wrote: > If patches from integrity/next-trusted-keys goes via your tree, then I > suggest that you re-base your patches on the top of our > patchset, because it is unclear how long review of PE, PKCS7 patches > will take and if they will be pulled... I'd rather not do that since other things are now depending on my patches. What's probably better is just to clean up the duplication later. That way, there need be no dependency between the two sets. David