From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: "V.Radhakrishnan" <rk@atr-labs.com>
Cc: Sanka Piyaratna <cesanka@yahoo.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PCIe device driver question
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:37:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4891F847.7030100@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1217509868.2156.18.camel@atlas>
V.Radhakrishnan wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Thanks for the reply. I was thinking that the MMIO and reserve memory
> will be below 4 GB was only applicable for 32-bit environments, since I
> don't have much experience in 64-bit.
>
> However, I had an IDENTICAL problem over 2 years ago. I had used
> posix_memalign() in user space to allocate pages aligned to 4096 byte
> pages, allocated several additional memaligned pages in user space, used
> mlock() to lock all these pages, gathered the user space addresses into
> the original pages as arrays of structures, passed this array into the
> kernel using an ioctl() call, used get_user_pages() to extract the
> struct page pointers, performed a kmap() to get the kernel virtual
> addresses and then extracted the physical addresses and 'sent' this to
> the chip to perform DMA.
>
> This situation is almost identical to what has been reported and hence
> my interest.
>
> However, I had a PCI access problem. The DMA was just NOT happening on
> any machine which had highmem, i.e over 896 MB.
My guess there was a bug in your DMA mapping code. I don't think kmap is
what is normally used for this. I think with get_user_pages one usually
takes the returned page pointers to create an SG list and uses
dma_map_sg to create a DMA mapping for them.
>
> I "solved" the problem since I didn't have much time to do R&D, by
> booting with kernel command line option of mem=512M and the DMA went
> thru successfully.
>
> This was the linux-2.6.15 kernel then. Since the project was basically
> to test the DMA capability of the device, the actual address to where it
> was DMA-ed didn't matter, and I got paid for my work. However, this
> matter was always at the back of my head.
>
> What could have been the problem with the x86 32-bit PCI ?
>
> Thanks and regards
>
> V. Radhakrishnan
> www.atr-labs.com
>
> On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 13:21 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
>> V.Radhakrishnan wrote:
>>>>> am testing this in an X86_64 architecture machine with 4 GB of RAM. I
>>>>> am able to successfully dma data into any memory (dma) address >
>>>>> 0x0000_0001_0000_0000.
>>> How can you DMA "successfully" into this address which is > 4 GB when
>>> you have only 4 GB RAM ? Or am I missing something ?
>> The MMIO and other reserved memory space at the top of the 32-bit memory
>> space will cause the top part of memory to be relocated above 4GB.
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-31 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.PmBLCqOb4Xo53y3W9hAdnsU50Og@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.42mxuHHJP7XQmYeyxNoEC/NFUHA@ifi.uio.no>
2008-07-30 19:21 ` Robert Hancock
2008-07-31 13:11 ` V.Radhakrishnan
2008-07-31 17:37 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2008-07-31 18:47 ` V.Radhakrishnan
2008-07-31 18:52 ` Robert Hancock
2008-07-31 20:47 ` V.Radhakrishnan
2008-07-31 9:58 Sanka Piyaratna
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-30 22:55 Sanka Piyaratna
2008-07-31 8:44 ` Robert Hancock
[not found] <fa.+kKL98uFtvbcX3ymh2HlJuUDVwY@ifi.uio.no>
2008-07-30 19:24 ` Robert Hancock
2008-07-30 16:09 Sanka Piyaratna
2008-07-30 16:51 ` V.Radhakrishnan
2008-07-30 16:55 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-30 16:00 Sanka Piyaratna
2008-07-30 15:47 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4891F847.7030100@shaw.ca \
--to=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=cesanka@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rk@atr-labs.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome