Howdee - first lkml post, please be gentle. :-) When a process setuid's to a non root user, under some circumstances it can no longer open /dev/stdout or /dev/stderr (which symlink to /proc/self/fd/1 & 2 respectively), which results in EACCESS. Expected behavior is that the process should be able to open these already opened filed descriptors, but I'm not sure if this is intended or not. Am I expecting too much here of /dev/std* and /proc/self/fd/* being kosher methods to access a process' already open file descriptors? (Background) >From a discussion in a user was attempting to open /dev/stderr for a log file under a djb supervised process. The process initially runs as root, then setuid's to another id. This process is connected to another process (for logging) on stdout (and dup'd onto stderr) via an anonymous pipe. The open of /dev/stderr fails with EACCESS. The above environment isn't necessary to replicate the problem, although what stdout and stderr are attached to has some effect. The attached C code replicates the issue, but appears to not fail (that is, succeed) if /proc/self/fd/2 is a terminal (e.g. /dev/pts/X) *and* that terminal is owned by the same uid that the code uses (in this case, 500). In the case of an anonymous pipe it appears to fail consistently as the pipe is owned by root. So, for example: # ls -nl /proc/self/fd/2 /dev/pts/2 crw------- 1 1000 5 136, 2 2008-08-07 15:36 /dev/pts/2 lrwx------ 1 0 0 64 2008-08-07 15:36 /proc/self/fd/2 -> /dev/pts/2 # ./self_fd /proc/self/fd/2 /proc/self/fd/2: uid: 1000, gid: 5 open(/proc/self/fd/2) as uid 500: Permission denied /proc/self/fd/2: uid: 1000, gid: 5 I've managed to replicate this issue on several platforms - a Centos 5.2 machine running 2.6.18-92, an Ubuntu 8.04 x86_64 running 2.6.24-19, and an Ubuntu 7.04 running 2.6.20-17 (A FreeBSD 4.11 box works OK though :-). Cheers, --dt