From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753778AbYIBJ6x (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Sep 2008 05:58:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753236AbYIBJ6j (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Sep 2008 05:58:39 -0400 Received: from E23SMTP01.au.ibm.com ([202.81.18.162]:41486 "EHLO e23smtp01.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753148AbYIBJ6i (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Sep 2008 05:58:38 -0400 Message-ID: <48BD0E4A.5040502@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:28:34 +0530 From: Balbir Singh Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Organization: IBM User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki CC: Nick Piggin , Andrew Morton , hugh@veritas.com, menage@google.com, xemul@openvz.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Remove cgroup member from struct page References: <20080831174756.GA25790@balbir.in.ibm.com> <200809011656.45190.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <20080901161927.a1fe5afc.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <200809011743.42658.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <48BD0641.4040705@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20080902190256.1375f593.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20080902190256.1375f593.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:54:17 +0530 > Balbir Singh wrote: > >> Nick Piggin wrote: >>> That could be a reasonable solution. Balbir has other concerns about >>> this... so I think it is OK to try the radix tree approach first. >> Thanks, Nick! >> >> Kamezawa-San, I would like to integrate the radix tree patches after review and >> some more testing then integrate your patchset on top of it. Do you have any >> objections/concerns with the suggested approach? >> > please show performance number first. Yes, that is why said some more testing. I am running lmbench and kernbench on it and some other tests, I'll get back with numbers. -- Balbir