From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Dean Nelson <dcn@sgi.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
Alan Mayer <ajm@sgi.com>,
jeremy@goop.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.lu@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] switch vector_irq[] from irq number to irq_desc pointer v2
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:12:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48D7B5F8.9020300@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080922110542.GD5987@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ingo,
>>
>> Note that my recent patch from a couple of weeks ago, stripped almost
>> all of the cpumask_t's from the io_apic functions. Any chance we can
>> apply them before we add more?
>>
>> I'd be willing to merge in Dean's patch over the top of mine (or
>> vice-versa).
>
> i'm really looking forwards to Rusty's 'get-rid-of-cpumask_t use'
> patchset, which would solve such cpumask_t proliferation issues once and
> for all.
>
> Ingo
Hi Ingo,
The net effect of the "getting rid of cpumask_t's" will be the same. This
patch reduces considerably the amount of stack space being required right
now. The new cpumask_t approach will take quite a bit of time to get it
"up and running". (It took me about a day to get init/main.c and kernel/sched.c
to just compile... it now needs the temp cpumasks to actually function. And
there are a number of areas that will need to be altered before functional
testing can start.)
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-22 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-19 20:02 [PATCH 0/3] unify the allocation of irq vectors v2 Dean Nelson
2008-09-19 20:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] switch vector_irq[] from irq number to irq_desc pointer v2 Dean Nelson
2008-09-19 20:24 ` Mike Travis
2008-09-19 23:17 ` Dean Nelson
2008-09-22 11:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-22 15:12 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2008-09-22 15:44 ` Mike Travis
2008-09-19 20:40 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-19 23:26 ` Dean Nelson
2008-09-19 20:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] switch static system vector allocation to use vector_irq[] v2 Dean Nelson
2008-09-19 20:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] switch non-standard SYSCALL_VECTOR allocation to use vector_irq v2 Dean Nelson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48D7B5F8.9020300@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=Yinghai.lu@amd.com \
--cc=ajm@sgi.com \
--cc=dcn@sgi.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome