From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
chirag@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [BUG][PPC64] BUG in 2.6.26.5-rt9 causing Hang
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:34:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48E14A00.7060105@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48E1460A.5000504@novell.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2946 bytes --]
Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Hi Chirag
>
> Chirag Jog wrote:
>
>> Hi Gregory,
>> We see the following BUG followed by a hang on the latest kernel 2.6.26.5-rt9 on a Power6 blade (PPC64)
>> It is easily recreated by running the async_handler or sbrk_mutex (realtime tests from ltp) tests.
>>
>>
>
> Call me an LTP newbie, but where can I get the sbrk_mutex/async_handler
> tests.
Ok, I figured out this part. I needed a newer version of the .rpm from
a different repo. However, both async_handler and sbrk_mutex seem to
segfault for me. Hmm
---
ghaskins@test:~> uname -a
Linux test 2.6.26.5-rt9-rt #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Mon Sep 29 14:26:45 EDT
2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
test:/home/ghaskins #
/usr/lib64/ltp/testcases/realtime/func/async_handler/async_handler
-----------------------------------
Asynchronous Event Handling Latency
-----------------------------------
jvmsim disabled
Running 1000000 iterations
Segmentation fault
---
Any ideas?
-Greg
> I installed the LTP rpm and I dont seem to have tests by that
> name. I have a 26.5-rt9 kernel all configured and ready to go but no
> way to reproduce this issue. Please advise.
>
> Regards,
> -Greg
>
>
>
>> login: cpu 0x2: Vector: 700 (Program Check) at [c0000000e8e875d0]
>> pc: c00000000005110c: .pick_next_pushable_task+0x54/0x9c
>> lr: c000000000059f50: .push_rt_task+0x44/0x2b4
>> sp: c0000000e8e87850
>> msr: 8000000000021032
>> current = 0xc0000000ea5bb2e0
>> paca = 0xc000000000608700
>> pid = 2811, comm = async_handler
>> kernel BUG at kernel/sched_rt.c:1041! <---------------------
>> enter ? for help
>> [link register ] c000000000059f50 .push_rt_task+0x44/0x2b4
>> [c0000000e8e87850] c0000000e8e878f0 (unreliable)
>> [c0000000e8e87900] c00000000005a1dc .push_rt_tasks+0x1c/0x38
>> [c0000000e8e87980] c00000000005a21c .post_schedule_rt+0x24/0x44
>> [c0000000e8e87a10] c000000000057cbc .finish_task_switch+0xd0/0x180
>> [c0000000e8e87ab0] c0000000003b6e88 .__schedule+0x6e0/0x798
>> [c0000000e8e87b90] c0000000003b7148 .schedule+0xec/0x11c
>> [c0000000e8e87c10] c0000000003b7a40 .do_nanosleep+0x6c/0xcc
>> [c0000000e8e87c90] c000000000080738 .hrtimer_nanosleep+0x7c/0x100
>> [c0000000e8e87d90] c000000000080830 .sys_nanosleep+0x74/0x94
>> [c0000000e8e87e30] c0000000000086ac syscall_exit+0x0/0x40
>> --- Exception: c00 (System Call) at 0000008026449844
>> SP (400014185f0) is in userspace
>>
>>
>> This is generated by the BUG_ON lines in the pick_next_pushable function
>> introduced by the sched-only-push-once-per-queue.patch .
>>
>> The -rt kernel prior to this patch didnot give such BUGes.
>>
>> All this was tried with
>> CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED=N
>> CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=N
>>
>>
>> Setting the options
>> CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED=y
>> CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=Y,
>> seems to solve the problem.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 257 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-29 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-25 12:32 Chirag Jog
2008-09-29 18:13 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-09-29 21:18 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-09-29 21:34 ` Gregory Haskins [this message]
2008-09-29 22:00 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-09-30 4:43 ` Chirag Jog
2008-09-30 6:47 ` Gilles Carry
2008-10-01 14:22 ` [PATCH] sched: add a stacktrace on enqueue_pushable error Gregory Haskins
2008-10-02 9:42 ` Gilles Carry
2008-10-02 11:18 ` [BUG][PPC64] BUG in 2.6.26.5-rt9 causing Hang Gilles Carry
2008-10-03 12:42 ` [RT PATCH 0/2] fix for BUG_ON crash in 26.5-rt9 Gregory Haskins
2008-10-03 12:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] RT: Remove comment that is no longer true Gregory Haskins
2008-10-03 12:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] RT: remove "paranoid" limit in push_rt_task Gregory Haskins
2008-10-03 13:46 ` Gilles Carry
2008-10-03 15:45 ` Chirag Jog
2008-10-03 17:27 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-10-03 17:26 ` [RT PATCH v2 0/2] Series short description Gregory Haskins
2008-10-03 17:26 ` [RT PATCH v2 1/2] RT: Remove comment that is no longer true Gregory Haskins
2008-10-03 17:26 ` [RT PATCH v2 2/2] RT: remove "paranoid" limit in push_rt_task Gregory Haskins
2008-10-03 12:54 ` [RT PATCH 0/2] fix for BUG_ON crash in 26.5-rt9 Gregory Haskins
2008-10-06 15:14 ` [RT PATCH v3 0/2] Fix for "[BUG][PPC64] BUG in 2.6.26.5-rt9 causing Hang" Gregory Haskins
2008-10-06 15:14 ` [RT PATCH v3 1/2] RT: Remove comment that is no longer true Gregory Haskins
2008-10-06 15:14 ` [RT PATCH v3 2/2] RT: fix push_rt_task() to handle dequeue_pushable properly Gregory Haskins
2008-10-07 6:04 ` [RT PATCH v3 0/2] Fix for "[BUG][PPC64] BUG in 2.6.26.5-rt9 causing Hang" Gilles Carry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48E14A00.7060105@novell.com \
--to=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=chirag@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome