On 29-09-08 21:13, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Rene Herman wrote:
>> I believe the possible issue is that resources that do _not_ (seem to) start
>> at zero might also be disabled.
> 
> But that is irrelevant.
> 
> If we have registered them in the resource tree, then PnP must ignore 
> them.
> 
> The fact is, this is not about being enabled or disabled. This is about 
> the PnP tree containing resources that we already parsed from the PCI 
> stuff, and once we've seen them as PCI resources, there's not really 
> anything valuable in the PnP information.

Well, if you say so...

Just did the attached which might match that intention. Please do not 
consider this a submission as I've no idea if this is sensible nor if it 
actually helps Frans. Just for discussion. Anything here should arrive 
through Bjorn.

Rene.