mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: KGDB: x86: Avoid invoking kgdb_nmicallback twice per NMI
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:43:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48E9F9C9.6060609@siemens.com> (raw)

Stress-testing KVM's latest NMI support with kgdbts inside an SMP guest,
I came across spurious unhandled NMIs while running the singlestep test.
Looking closer at the code path each NMI takes when KGDB is enabled, I
noticed that kgdb_nmicallback is called twice per event: One time via
DIE_NMI_IPI notification, the second time on DIE_NMI. Removing the first
invocation cures the unhandled NMIs here.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c |    7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: b/arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c
===================================================================
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c
@@ -455,12 +455,7 @@ static int __kgdb_notify(struct die_args
 		return NOTIFY_DONE;
 
 	case DIE_NMI_IPI:
-		if (atomic_read(&kgdb_active) != -1) {
-			/* KGDB CPU roundup */
-			kgdb_nmicallback(raw_smp_processor_id(), regs);
-			was_in_debug_nmi[raw_smp_processor_id()] = 1;
-			touch_nmi_watchdog();
-		}
+		/* Just ignore, we will handle the roundup on DIE_NMI. */
 		return NOTIFY_DONE;
 
 	case DIE_NMIUNKNOWN:

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

                 reply	other threads:[~2008-10-06 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48E9F9C9.6060609@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome