From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
arjan@linux.intel.com, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/7] x86, cpa: make the kernel physical mapping initialization a two pass sequence
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:09:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48EA9AC3.1050603@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48EA798D.1090303@goop.org>
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> As it is, I suspect it will take a non-trivial amount of work to
> restore Xen with this code in place (touching this code is always
> non-trivial). I haven't looked into it in depth yet, but there's a
> few stand out "bad for Xen" pieces of code here. (And I haven't
> tested 32-bit yet.)
32-bit Xen is OK with this patch. Reverting it restores 64-bit Xen.
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-06 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-23 21:00 [patch 0/7] x86, cpa: cpa related changes to be inline with TLB Application note - v2 Suresh Siddha
2008-09-23 21:00 ` [patch 1/7] x86, cpa: rename PTE attribute macros for kernel direct mapping in early boot Suresh Siddha
2008-09-23 21:00 ` [patch 2/7] x86, cpa: remove USER permission from the very early identity mapping attribute Suresh Siddha
2008-09-23 21:00 ` [patch 3/7] x86, cpa: make the kernel physical mapping initialization a two pass sequence Suresh Siddha
2008-10-06 20:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-06 23:09 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-10-07 1:58 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-10-07 15:28 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-07 20:58 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-10-07 21:33 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-08 19:46 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-08 21:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-23 21:00 ` [patch 4/7] x86, cpa: dont use large pages for kernel identity mapping with DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Suresh Siddha
2008-09-23 21:00 ` [patch 5/7] x86, cpa: no need to check alias for __set_pages_p/__set_pages_np Suresh Siddha
2008-09-23 21:00 ` [patch 6/7] x86, cpa: remove cpa pool code Suresh Siddha
2008-09-23 21:00 ` [patch 7/7] x86, cpa: srlz cpa(), global flush tlb after splitting big page and before doing cpa Suresh Siddha
2008-09-24 8:15 ` [patch 0/7] x86, cpa: cpa related changes to be inline with TLB Application note - v2 Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-11 20:30 [patch 0/7] x86, cpa: cpa related changes to be inline with TLB Application note Suresh Siddha
2008-09-11 20:30 ` [patch 3/7] x86, cpa: make the kernel physical mapping initialization a two pass sequence Suresh Siddha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48EA9AC3.1050603@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome