From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 004.mia.mailroute.net (004.mia.mailroute.net [199.89.3.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B03F27A112 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2025 15:59:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.7 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752163192; cv=none; b=hqmD1DbxtauOk1P2OGXkqUWjg6KD2tDmlBnaTEhUmHcviTRrrtXSL4fxbmoJb7EIApRuOcID8dXZrd8JZBpuyfUT3vvSuIAprpxgCYjVx90BbB/c0OdO4RIZRorrkXBCu6VwQ7upsue7Tb6eexpnmy7LLA7bCwN3Mg3bMWaCN1g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752163192; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YRvREnEGJodTCrOLHXy8PdaJa6Il/fCMlrEAABhM9QQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=riDDBqQnk85mW2o6Zmhg/tNLhDq6aaQfuoMelWEd3izGHvcVnQjmuqzlPVwF0fgjh9/uMbLzBYFe1JdRztcJ5QgndxTdhY3xGBMaYCM8fDFCUAn7fU9jk2yyR030kmFB18W1ZyoJc1sOZiyMPG4dIiXsgYKFLuD0FMdtM2mhyGY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=ISG2N8Xl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.3.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="ISG2N8Xl" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 004.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bdKFD3H8Wzm0yT2; Thu, 10 Jul 2025 15:55:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1752162942; x=1754754943; bh=YRvREnEGJodTCrOLHXy8PdaJ a6Il/fCMlrEAABhM9QQ=; b=ISG2N8Xl1Aq5GQgBzOXIOVmfVj8gwoe4U9AQetJu nMUI1yIf1FQznOhyl17IBktzSlUioLdx1d9kdmKtjgW/eqYHvQ2lpfDHlPoN0Ee0 39vrVAw8oTTp8caHIflbt5usfpVKTRIGya2heCbvoQzF0Dz+BKaBPTShvfTF24Gz HPzU+0GyZM0Jb17hww0/SHxd2dpqynnAgZtVZTvcYPR/lNd1NFVt76KbJMCjzPKh n+7M4zN9rEJidcDmqh3aaKbPEZ4oxjx/ynWDKR/fDdjQ4640+L4IP2HAcLJul26Y FzCUNZDlyuOHJ9LhLxXP9p3XFILnGcOA3de3wXOKKR9xgg== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 004.mia.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (004.mia [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id ln-ogYi7nizy; Thu, 10 Jul 2025 15:55:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.66.154.22] (unknown [104.135.204.82]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 004.mia.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4bdKF15mWNzm174y; Thu, 10 Jul 2025 15:55:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <48bd1925-94b6-4913-9cbc-f348e4dc4ae6@acm.org> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 08:55:31 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dm-verity: remove support for asynchronous hashes To: Milan Broz , Eric Biggers , dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, Alasdair Kergon , Mike Snitzer , Mikulas Patocka Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gilad Ben-Yossef , Ard Biesheuvel , "Jason A . Donenfeld" , Sami Tolvanen References: <20250709190902.49554-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <1ee8338a-b19a-409a-bbe6-2068893b8abc@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <1ee8338a-b19a-409a-bbe6-2068893b8abc@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 7/10/25 1:28 AM, Milan Broz wrote: > Just one nitpick - could you please increase minor version of dm- > verity target, so we have information in debug log that it is a > patched version? Others are convinced that version numbers have no place in the upstream kernel and that all version information should be removed from upstream kernel drivers. Thanks, Bart.