From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, jiri@resnulli.us, ivecera@redhat.com,
kuba@kernel.org, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, olteanv@gmail.com,
andrew@lunn.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v5 9/9] bridge: mrp: Integrate MRP into the bridge
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 11:25:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48c8e196-5808-d7c8-25c3-dff8f56dea5b@cumulusnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200414112618.3644-10-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
On 14/04/2020 14:26, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> To integrate MRP into the bridge, the bridge needs to do the following:
> - add new flag(BR_MPP_AWARE) to the net bridge ports, this bit will be set when
> the port is added to an MRP instance. In this way it knows if the frame was
> received on MRP ring port
> - detect if the MRP frame was received on MRP ring port in that case it would be
> processed otherwise just forward it as usual.
> - enable parsing of MRP
> - before whenever the bridge was set up, it would set all the ports in
> forwarding state. Add an extra check to not set ports in forwarding state if
> the port is an MRP ring port. The reason of this change is that if the MRP
> instance initially sets the port in blocked state by setting the bridge up it
> would overwrite this setting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
> ---
> include/linux/if_bridge.h | 1 +
> net/bridge/br_device.c | 3 +++
> net/bridge/br_if.c | 2 ++
> net/bridge/br_input.c | 3 +++
> net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 5 +++++
> net/bridge/br_private.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> net/bridge/br_stp.c | 6 ++++++
> net/bridge/br_stp_if.c | 5 +++++
> 8 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/if_bridge.h b/include/linux/if_bridge.h
> index 9e57c4411734..10baa9efdae8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/if_bridge.h
> +++ b/include/linux/if_bridge.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct br_ip_list {
> #define BR_BCAST_FLOOD BIT(14)
> #define BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS BIT(15)
> #define BR_ISOLATED BIT(16)
> +#define BR_MRP_AWARE BIT(17)
>
> #define BR_DEFAULT_AGEING_TIME (300 * HZ)
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_device.c b/net/bridge/br_device.c
> index 0e3dbc5f3c34..8ec1362588af 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_device.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_device.c
> @@ -463,6 +463,9 @@ void br_dev_setup(struct net_device *dev)
> spin_lock_init(&br->lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&br->port_list);
> INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&br->fdb_list);
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP)
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&br->mrp_list);
> +#endif
> spin_lock_init(&br->hash_lock);
>
> br->bridge_id.prio[0] = 0x80;
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_if.c b/net/bridge/br_if.c
> index 4fe30b182ee7..ca685c0cdf95 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_if.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_if.c
> @@ -333,6 +333,8 @@ static void del_nbp(struct net_bridge_port *p)
> br_stp_disable_port(p);
> spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
>
> + br_mrp_port_del(br, p);
> +
> br_ifinfo_notify(RTM_DELLINK, NULL, p);
>
> list_del_rcu(&p->list);
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> index fcc260840028..d5c34f36f0f4 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> @@ -342,6 +342,9 @@ rx_handler_result_t br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
> }
> }
>
> + if (unlikely(br_mrp_process(p, skb)))
> + return RX_HANDLER_PASS;
> +
> forward:
> switch (p->state) {
> case BR_STATE_FORWARDING:
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> index 43dab4066f91..8826fcd1eb76 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> @@ -669,6 +669,11 @@ static int br_afspec(struct net_bridge *br,
> if (err)
> return err;
> break;
> + case IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP:
> + err = br_mrp_parse(br, p, attr, cmd, extack);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + break;
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> index 1f97703a52ff..5835828320b6 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
> @@ -428,6 +428,10 @@ struct net_bridge {
> int offload_fwd_mark;
> #endif
> struct hlist_head fdb_list;
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP)
> + struct list_head __rcu mrp_list;
> +#endif
> };
>
> struct br_input_skb_cb {
> @@ -1304,6 +1308,37 @@ unsigned long br_timer_value(const struct timer_list *timer);
> extern int (*br_fdb_test_addr_hook)(struct net_device *dev, unsigned char *addr);
> #endif
>
> +/* br_mrp.c */
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP)
> +int br_mrp_parse(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p,
> + struct nlattr *attr, int cmd, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> +int br_mrp_process(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct sk_buff *skb);
> +bool br_mrp_enabled(struct net_bridge *br);
> +void br_mrp_port_del(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p);
> +#else
> +static inline int br_mrp_parse(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p,
> + struct nlattr *attr, int cmd,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int br_mrp_process(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool br_mrp_enabled(struct net_bridge *br)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void br_mrp_port_del(struct net_bridge *br,
> + struct net_bridge_port *p)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> /* br_netlink.c */
> extern struct rtnl_link_ops br_link_ops;
> int br_netlink_init(void);
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp.c b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> index 1f14b8455345..3e88be7aa269 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,12 @@ void br_set_state(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned int state)
> };
> int err;
>
> + /* Don't change the state of the ports if they are driven by a different
> + * protocol.
> + */
> + if (p->flags & BR_MRP_AWARE)
> + return;
> +
> p->state = state;
> err = switchdev_port_attr_set(p->dev, &attr);
> if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> index d174d3a566aa..542b212d5033 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c
> @@ -200,6 +200,11 @@ void br_stp_set_enabled(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long val)
> {
> ASSERT_RTNL();
>
> + if (br_mrp_enabled(br)) {
> + br_warn(br, "STP can't be enabled if MRP is already enabled\n");
It'd be nice if this can be returned in an extack if this function is called from netlink.
In addition this must return an error - otherwise writing to the sysfs file would be successful
while nothing will have changed, so the user will think it worked. Check out set_stp_state().
You can drop the br_warn, just make sure to return proper extack error from netlink (it is
the preferred interface over sysfs, so simply returning an error for sysfs would be enough).
> + return;
> + }
> +
> if (val) {
> if (br->stp_enabled == BR_NO_STP)
> br_stp_start(br);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-18 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-14 11:26 [RFC net-next v5 0/9] net: bridge: mrp: Add support for Media Redundancy Protocol(MRP) Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-14 11:26 ` [RFC net-next v5 1/9] bridge: uapi: mrp: Add mrp attributes Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-14 11:26 ` [RFC net-next v5 2/9] bridge: mrp: Update Kconfig and Makefile Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-18 8:49 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2020-04-14 11:26 ` [RFC net-next v5 3/9] bridge: mrp: Expose function br_mrp_port_open Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-18 8:11 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2020-04-18 15:29 ` Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-14 11:26 ` [RFC net-next v5 4/9] bridge: mrp: Add MRP interface Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-14 11:26 ` [RFC net-next v5 5/9] switchdev: mrp: Extend switchdev API to offload MRP Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-14 11:26 ` [RFC net-next v5 6/9] bridge: switchdev: mrp: Implement MRP API for switchdev Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-14 11:26 ` [RFC net-next v5 7/9] bridge: mrp: Connect MRP API with the switchev API Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-18 8:46 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2020-04-18 14:57 ` Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-18 8:50 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2020-04-14 11:26 ` [RFC net-next v5 8/9] bridge: mrp: Implement netlink interface to configure MRP Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-18 8:21 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2020-04-18 14:48 ` Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-18 8:34 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2020-04-18 14:51 ` Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-14 11:26 ` [RFC net-next v5 9/9] bridge: mrp: Integrate MRP into the bridge Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-18 8:25 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov [this message]
2020-04-18 14:44 ` Horatiu Vultur
2020-04-18 9:01 ` [RFC net-next v5 0/9] net: bridge: mrp: Add support for Media Redundancy Protocol(MRP) Nikolay Aleksandrov
2020-04-18 15:03 ` Horatiu Vultur
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48c8e196-5808-d7c8-25c3-dff8f56dea5b@cumulusnetworks.com \
--to=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®