From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B8CC76188 for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 09:20:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB4F2173B for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 09:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727354AbfGSJUq (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jul 2019 05:20:46 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59918 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725794AbfGSJUq (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jul 2019 05:20:46 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6EA330860CF; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 09:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.117.221] (ovpn-117-221.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.221]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB3D5D970; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 09:20:43 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drivers/base/node.c: Simplify unregister_memory_block_under_nodes() To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andrew Morton , Stephen Rothwell , Pavel Tatashin , Oscar Salvador References: <20190718142239.7205-1-david@redhat.com> <20190719084239.GO30461@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20190719091313.GR30461@dhcp22.suse.cz> From: David Hildenbrand Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwX4EEwECACgFAljj9eoCGwMFCQlmAYAGCwkI BwMCBhUIAgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEE3eEPcA/4Na5IIP/3T/FIQMxIfNzZshIq687qgG 8UbspuE/YSUDdv7r5szYTK6KPTlqN8NAcSfheywbuYD9A4ZeSBWD3/NAVUdrCaRP2IvFyELj xoMvfJccbq45BxzgEspg/bVahNbyuBpLBVjVWwRtFCUEXkyazksSv8pdTMAs9IucChvFmmq3 jJ2vlaz9lYt/lxN246fIVceckPMiUveimngvXZw21VOAhfQ+/sofXF8JCFv2mFcBDoa7eYob s0FLpmqFaeNRHAlzMWgSsP80qx5nWWEvRLdKWi533N2vC/EyunN3HcBwVrXH4hxRBMco3jvM m8VKLKao9wKj82qSivUnkPIwsAGNPdFoPbgghCQiBjBe6A75Z2xHFrzo7t1jg7nQfIyNC7ez MZBJ59sqA9EDMEJPlLNIeJmqslXPjmMFnE7Mby/+335WJYDulsRybN+W5rLT5aMvhC6x6POK z55fMNKrMASCzBJum2Fwjf/VnuGRYkhKCqqZ8gJ3OvmR50tInDV2jZ1DQgc3i550T5JDpToh dPBxZocIhzg+MBSRDXcJmHOx/7nQm3iQ6iLuwmXsRC6f5FbFefk9EjuTKcLMvBsEx+2DEx0E UnmJ4hVg7u1PQ+2Oy+Lh/opK/BDiqlQ8Pz2jiXv5xkECvr/3Sv59hlOCZMOaiLTTjtOIU7Tq 7ut6OL64oAq+zsFNBFXLn5EBEADn1959INH2cwYJv0tsxf5MUCghCj/CA/lc/LMthqQ773ga uB9mN+F1rE9cyyXb6jyOGn+GUjMbnq1o121Vm0+neKHUCBtHyseBfDXHA6m4B3mUTWo13nid 0e4AM71r0DS8+KYh6zvweLX/LL5kQS9GQeT+QNroXcC1NzWbitts6TZ+IrPOwT1hfB4WNC+X 2n4AzDqp3+ILiVST2DT4VBc11Gz6jijpC/KI5Al8ZDhRwG47LUiuQmt3yqrmN63V9wzaPhC+ xbwIsNZlLUvuRnmBPkTJwwrFRZvwu5GPHNndBjVpAfaSTOfppyKBTccu2AXJXWAE1Xjh6GOC 8mlFjZwLxWFqdPHR1n2aPVgoiTLk34LR/bXO+e0GpzFXT7enwyvFFFyAS0Nk1q/7EChPcbRb hJqEBpRNZemxmg55zC3GLvgLKd5A09MOM2BrMea+l0FUR+PuTenh2YmnmLRTro6eZ/qYwWkC u8FFIw4pT0OUDMyLgi+GI1aMpVogTZJ70FgV0pUAlpmrzk/bLbRkF3TwgucpyPtcpmQtTkWS gDS50QG9DR/1As3LLLcNkwJBZzBG6PWbvcOyrwMQUF1nl4SSPV0LLH63+BrrHasfJzxKXzqg rW28CTAE2x8qi7e/6M/+XXhrsMYG+uaViM7n2je3qKe7ofum3s4vq7oFCPsOgwARAQABwsFl BBgBAgAPBQJVy5+RAhsMBQkJZgGAAAoJEE3eEPcA/4NagOsP/jPoIBb/iXVbM+fmSHOjEshl KMwEl/m5iLj3iHnHPVLBUWrXPdS7iQijJA/VLxjnFknhaS60hkUNWexDMxVVP/6lbOrs4bDZ NEWDMktAeqJaFtxackPszlcpRVkAs6Msn9tu8hlvB517pyUgvuD7ZS9gGOMmYwFQDyytpepo YApVV00P0u3AaE0Cj/o71STqGJKZxcVhPaZ+LR+UCBZOyKfEyq+ZN311VpOJZ1IvTExf+S/5 lqnciDtbO3I4Wq0ArLX1gs1q1XlXLaVaA3yVqeC8E7kOchDNinD3hJS4OX0e1gdsx/e6COvy qNg5aL5n0Kl4fcVqM0LdIhsubVs4eiNCa5XMSYpXmVi3HAuFyg9dN+x8thSwI836FoMASwOl C7tHsTjnSGufB+D7F7ZBT61BffNBBIm1KdMxcxqLUVXpBQHHlGkbwI+3Ye+nE6HmZH7IwLwV W+Ajl7oYF+jeKaH4DZFtgLYGLtZ1LDwKPjX7VAsa4Yx7S5+EBAaZGxK510MjIx6SGrZWBrrV TEvdV00F2MnQoeXKzD7O4WFbL55hhyGgfWTHwZ457iN9SgYi1JLPqWkZB0JRXIEtjd4JEQcx +8Umfre0Xt4713VxMygW0PnQt5aSQdMD58jHFxTk092mU+yIHj5LeYgvwSgZN4airXk5yRXl SE+xAvmumFBY Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: <48ea1d5d-ce40-aaad-b9fe-006488ed71dc@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 11:20:43 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190719091313.GR30461@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.44]); Fri, 19 Jul 2019 09:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 19.07.19 11:13, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 19-07-19 11:05:51, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 19.07.19 10:42, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> On Thu 18-07-19 16:22:39, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> We don't allow to offline memory block devices that belong to multiple >>>> numa nodes. Therefore, such devices can never get removed. It is >>>> sufficient to process a single node when removing the memory block. >>>> >>>> Remember for each memory block if it belongs to no, a single, or mixed >>>> nodes, so we can use that information to skip unregistering or print a >>>> warning (essentially a safety net to catch BUGs). >>> >>> I do not really like NUMA_NO_NODE - 1 thing. This is yet another invalid >>> node that is magic. Why should we even care? In other words why is this >>> patch an improvement? >> >> Oh, and to answer that part of the question: >> >> We no longer have to iterate over each pfn of a memory block to be removed. > > Is it possible that we are overzealous when unregistering syfs files and > we should simply skip the pfn walk even without this change? > I assume you mean something like v1 without the warning/"NUMA_NO_NODE -1"? See what I have right now below. >From 27e9b02146e5fbe8edac49767693fa18c9b204dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Hildenbrand Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 15:48:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2] drivers/base/node.c: Simplify unregister_memory_block_under_nodes() We don't allow to offline memory block devices that belong to multiple numa nodes. Therefore, such devices can never get removed. It is sufficient to process a single node when removing the memory block. Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Pavel Tatashin Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Oscar Salvador Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- drivers/base/memory.c | 1 + drivers/base/node.c | 39 +++++++++++++++------------------------ 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c index 20c39d1bcef8..154d5d4a0779 100644 --- a/drivers/base/memory.c +++ b/drivers/base/memory.c @@ -674,6 +674,7 @@ static int init_memory_block(struct memory_block **memory, mem->state = state; start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem->start_section_nr); mem->phys_device = arch_get_memory_phys_device(start_pfn); + mem->nid = NUMA_NO_NODE; ret = register_memory(mem); diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c index 75b7e6f6535b..840c95baa1d8 100644 --- a/drivers/base/node.c +++ b/drivers/base/node.c @@ -759,8 +759,6 @@ static int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, int ret, nid = *(int *)arg; unsigned long pfn, sect_start_pfn, sect_end_pfn; - mem_blk->nid = nid; - sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->start_section_nr); sect_end_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->end_section_nr); sect_end_pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION - 1; @@ -789,6 +787,13 @@ static int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, if (page_nid != nid) continue; } + + /* + * If this memory block spans multiple nodes, we only indicate + * the last processed node. + */ + mem_blk->nid = nid; + ret = sysfs_create_link_nowarn(&node_devices[nid]->dev.kobj, &mem_blk->dev.kobj, kobject_name(&mem_blk->dev.kobj)); @@ -804,32 +809,18 @@ static int register_mem_sect_under_node(struct memory_block *mem_blk, } /* - * Unregister memory block device under all nodes that it spans. - * Has to be called with mem_sysfs_mutex held (due to unlinked_nodes). + * Unregister a memory block device under the node it spans. Memory blocks + * with multiple nodes cannot be offlined and therefore also never be removed. */ void unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(struct memory_block *mem_blk) { - unsigned long pfn, sect_start_pfn, sect_end_pfn; - static nodemask_t unlinked_nodes; - - nodes_clear(unlinked_nodes); - sect_start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->start_section_nr); - sect_end_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->end_section_nr); - for (pfn = sect_start_pfn; pfn <= sect_end_pfn; pfn++) { - int nid; + if (mem_blk->nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) + return; - nid = get_nid_for_pfn(pfn); - if (nid < 0) - continue; - if (!node_online(nid)) - continue; - if (node_test_and_set(nid, unlinked_nodes)) - continue; - sysfs_remove_link(&node_devices[nid]->dev.kobj, - kobject_name(&mem_blk->dev.kobj)); - sysfs_remove_link(&mem_blk->dev.kobj, - kobject_name(&node_devices[nid]->dev.kobj)); - } + sysfs_remove_link(&node_devices[mem_blk->nid]->dev.kobj, + kobject_name(&mem_blk->dev.kobj)); + sysfs_remove_link(&mem_blk->dev.kobj, + kobject_name(&node_devices[mem_blk->nid]->dev.kobj)); } int link_mem_sections(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn) -- 2.21.0 -- Thanks, David / dhildenb