From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Alistair John Strachan <alistair@devzero.co.uk>
Cc: Robert Moss <robert.von.moss@gmail.com>,
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Framebuffer issues in 2.6.26 with uvesafb and vesafb. Linux is about choice!
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:26:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <490097BF.8050407@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200810231322.15257.alistair@devzero.co.uk>
Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> On Thursday 23 October 2008 12:21:09 Robert Moss wrote:
>> I also want to note, that I downloaded 2.6.27.3 and compiled, with
>> CONFIG_FB_VESA=Y, and still get excactly the same response as from
>> 2.6.26
>
> Useful info, and I checked your configs and they enable the right options.
> Looks like you've found a real bug.
>
> IIRC, a lot of real mode assembler (including the x86 vga/vesa stuff, iirc)
> was rewritten a year or so ago, in C. This might have been the time that this
> bug was introduced. I've added hpa to CC since I believe he was the author of
> these changes.
>
> (Summary of the original report is that vga= vesa mode selection seems to have
> broken for Robert since at least 2.6.26, and after 2.6.24. From what I can see
> he has the right vesafb options enabled.)
>
That happend in 2.6.23 I believe, so that would be unrelated.
The best would be to bisect the regression. The second best would be if
he could run the "vesainfo" program from the Syslinux distribution (it's
a pre-boot program that dumps information on the VESA stack). The third
best would be to set up Xorg to run the "vesa" driver, and send
/var/log/Xorg.0.log.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-23 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-23 7:54 Robert Moss
2008-10-23 8:04 ` Samuel Thibault
2008-10-23 9:17 ` Alistair John Strachan
2008-10-23 11:21 ` Robert Moss
2008-10-23 12:22 ` Alistair John Strachan
2008-10-23 15:26 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2008-10-24 9:24 ` Samuel Thibault
2008-10-25 20:22 ` Robert Moss
2008-10-25 21:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-10-23 11:26 ` Robert Moss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=490097BF.8050407@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=alistair@devzero.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert.von.moss@gmail.com \
--cc=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome