From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755435Ab1J2XV5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:21:57 -0400 Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:45999 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755335Ab1J2XVz (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:21:55 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3-dev To: Herbert Xu Cc: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Linus , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (crypto) In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:45:44 +0200." <20111027074544.GA19905@gondor.apana.org.au> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <20111025203628.40a1b8a475e32053aa34dabe@canb.auug.org.au> <4EA75759.3050900@xenotime.net> <20111026062717.GA10230@gondor.apana.org.au> <7836.1319699116@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20111027074544.GA19905@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1319930427_32791P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:20:27 -0400 Message-ID: <49073.1319930427@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu 2 pass X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=steiner.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A02020B.4EAC8A40.007C,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1319930427_32791P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:45:44 +0200, Herbert Xu said: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 03:05:16AM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > > Are there any use cases where a config (probably embedded) would wantq > > CRYPTO_USER but not CRYPTO_NET? Would seem a shame to pull in the entire > > Since the CRYPTO_USER interface sits on top of netlink I don't > see how you could possibly avoid NET. Oh, OK. The original bug report looked like just some utility functions not defined, so I didn't pick up on the "it needs netlink" aspect of it. --==_Exmh_1319930427_32791P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFOrIo7cC3lWbTT17ARAqLTAJ4tO11YTXGnzUPMNF9qFITPhJwAvACgmV/x UnTxPqqbZqAARe095NBobOc= =XJkt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1319930427_32791P--