Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>     
>>> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>>> does it have any dependency on:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Subject: [PATCH 1/2] bio: define __BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE
>>>>>>             
>>>>> No, they're independent.  Defining __BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE will be 
>>>>> useful for the Xen changes I need to make in the wake of Tomo's 
>>>>> patch.
>>>>>           
>>>> ok - applied to tip/x86/xen, thanks Jeremy! (also added Jens's 
>>>> Acked-by)
>>>>         
>>> build failure, zapped it:
>>>
>>> fs/bio.c: In function '__bio_add_page':
>>> fs/bio.c:443: error: implicit declaration of function '__BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE'
>>>       
>> What patch(es) did you apply?
>>     
>
> the one i replied to (2/2), and which one Jeremy said was independent 
> of 1/2. Not so much it appears.
>   

Sorry, miscommunication.  I meant you should apply 1/2, and drop 2/2.

    J
> 	Ingo
>