From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] kernel/rcu: add kfree_rcu
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:48:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <496174EB.4030601@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090104194851.GM6958@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> In any case, I do apologize -- since I didn't see anything from you I
> incorrectly assumed that you had given up on this patch. Please accept
> my apologies!
It's my fault.
I'm a very low-yield developer.
I have given up on unaccepted cleanup-patches, kfree_rcu() is not a
cleanup for reducing lines of code, it has some significances for kernel.
>
> Would it be possible for you and Manfred to agree on a common patch, and
> to have one of you submit it with both of you having Signed-off-by on it?
>
All are OK.
I NAK-ed only for deferring kfree_rcu() being accepted.
I'm not concerned about whether I'm patches' Author or I'm in the
Signed-off-by list.
Thanks,
Lai.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-05 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-02 11:25 Manfred Spraul
2009-01-02 18:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-03 14:59 ` Manfred Spraul
2009-01-03 23:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-04 5:50 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-01-04 19:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-05 2:48 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2009-01-05 4:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-06 22:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-05 7:15 ` Manfred Spraul
2009-01-04 5:39 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-01-04 7:07 ` Manfred Spraul
2009-01-04 8:30 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-01-04 12:22 ` Manfred Spraul
2009-01-04 20:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-01-12 17:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=496174EB.4030601@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome