From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gloria.sntech.de (gloria.sntech.de [185.11.138.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 945CD476681; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 12:24:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790771069; cv=none; b=Ze1HtWrLcxwqRDnXv7Q9OR03jQJYOfWDGiiEoI3siOHY2dG6PcF/tQznkSTvIRYsQpTMUD+bmKIIdQTft3pyBpzU8YisBPvqVZ98kcDQeZ/gCl3lAlQ3qJdXjqmdUqV7CVpB+qnJONtny7OG0IWD+x1C7xvz8+w5BH86f3fbYmo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790771069; c=relaxed/simple; bh=piNSrEoSPCszpzGrKKrAuQ/SVlY/vW75fVaBvN+BabA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nMXLB6SLfSRC2yB6T3JwGQXkPnhKi/xigMxkrMz3hdSMP6h16QoHrUZqwu9h8ur9DCLJs3WBE1vKK/jitC1lIiTsjLvocGclPCxuU1Nv78flN7ZtvNeD127OLng+NgB6KIxyITC1a9BOArt397G1c5+nVp3lPM116wYkgbbVsa0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=sntech.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b=cCcyPSNM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b="cCcyPSNM" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sntech.de; s=gloria202408; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To; bh=piNSrEoSPCszpzGrKKrAuQ/SVlY/vW75fVaBvN+BabA=; b=cCcyPSNMLvL3kUvI2KXhnu6oW8 0AwrWXVtxzslHde7At6k0FyZeXiSCcGzRvF+4CZ4kWkgMQR2SqCUngAxz2FjKEQs1aCqv7ztWsKnv jMWWZPJXfzXr7V+lNuNaEgUq3gP0m0oiVlGP3A4vLpNwACPYKhPzenaz+Ayu4v7VY0eqb2tu3Ca+6 gd8gMik0ImrIqa1KCHe5kF4QR6Jo5r46qijBU7YRGijnuAqcPTEdB4L0BuFpLgHc0Q9Hqiw63I6kY Q9kOiy1rz6RZDNmtMkIaeeUhEPAgBKr3xe7V+6TOv4kcaMrp7VEHAm8ggdjcmM1wD1VgLNMOy5xHW rBSdEPTA==; From: Heiko =?UTF-8?B?U3TDvGJuZXI=?= To: Stephen Boyd , Brian Masney , Jerome Brunet , Francesco Dolcini Cc: Francesco Dolcini , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: clk-gpio: do not blame the DT property on probe deferral Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 14:24:18 +0200 Message-ID: <4966058.VLH7GnMWUR@diego> In-Reply-To: <20260930114907.153690-1-francesco@dolcini.it> References: <20260930114907.153690-1-francesco@dolcini.it> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2026, 13:49:06 Mitteleurop=C3=A4ische Sommerzeit= schrieb Francesco Dolcini: > From: Francesco Dolcini >=20 > The message is also stored as the probe deferral reason, where it wrongly > claims the 'enable'/'select' property is missing while it is the GPIO > provider that has not probed (yet?). >=20 > Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner