mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jay Fenlason <fenlason@redhat.com>
Subject: post 2.6.28 regression: device_initialize() now sleeps, and may fail without recovery strategy
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:35:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <496798FE.8030900@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)

>From commit 2831fe6f9cc4e16c103504ee09a47a084297c0f3, "driver core:
create a private portion of struct device":

 void device_initialize(struct device *dev)
 {
+	dev->p = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev->p), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!dev->p) {
+		WARN_ON(1);
+		return;
+	}
+	dev->p->device = dev;
 	dev->kobj.kset = devices_kset;
 	kobject_init(&dev->kobj, &device_ktype);


First of all, this prevents initialization of struct device in atomic
contexts, such as drivers/firewire/fw-device.c::fw_node_event.

This is a bug in current mainline.

We can fix the bug by changing firewire-core, but
  a) it'd be more than a one-liner,
  b) who knows which other subsystems are affected.

Next, the above code is bogus.  In 2.6.28, device_initialize() could
never fail and was thus safe to use as a void-valued function.

How does driver core handle dev->p == NULL in subsequent usages of dev now?
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= ---= -=--=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/

             reply	other threads:[~2009-01-09 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-09 18:35 Stefan Richter [this message]
2009-01-09 19:49 ` [PATCH post 2.6.28] firewire: core: fix sleep in atomic context due to driver core change Stefan Richter
2009-01-09 21:17   ` Alan Cox
2009-01-09 21:54     ` Greg KH
2009-01-09 22:28       ` [git pull] FireWire fix Stefan Richter
2009-01-09 20:56 ` post 2.6.28 regression: device_initialize() now sleeps, and may fail without recovery strategy Greg KH
2009-01-09 21:13   ` Stefan Richter
2009-01-09 21:20     ` Stefan Richter
2009-01-09 21:34       ` Greg KH
2009-01-09 21:30     ` Greg KH
2009-01-09 21:40       ` Stefan Richter
2009-01-09 21:24   ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=496798FE.8030900@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --cc=fenlason@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®