mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: Enrik Berkhan <Enrik.Berkhan@ge.com>
Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@csr.com>,
	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@drzeus.cx>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Reference counting of MMC host driver modules
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:49:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49686F0C.7030807@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090109200024.GA14754@ngeserver2.localdomain>

Enrik Berkhan wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 06:20:32PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
>> Enrik Berkhan wrote:
>>> I've noticed recently that the MMC/SD block driver does not reference 
>>> count the MMC/SD host driver module that it uses via the MMC/SD core 
>>> layer. Thus, I can rmmod my host driver module while, for example, a 
>>> partition on a SD card is mounted.
>> This is same as removing the card while it's in use.
> 
> I don't think so.
> 
> Being able to remove the card while it is in use is a bug of the
> mechanical interface. Can't be fixed easily.
> 
> Being able to remove the module while it is in use is a bug of the
> software. Can be fixed.

Here is my implementation experience with the issue, concerning the two
FireWire driver stacks which I maintain:

In case of firewire (new FireWire stack), module removal of the
controller driver will trigger removal of all child and grandchild
devices, e.g. sd_shutdown of FireWire HDDs.

This will have the same effect as if the cable of the HDD was pulled.
I don't see a need to prevent this because whoever runs
# modprobe -r firewire-ohci
is supposed to know what he is doing.

But in case of ieee1394 (old FireWire stack), the sbp2 storage driver
calls try_module_get() on the host driver whenever it starts using a
device, and of course module_put() when it is done.  I.e. modprobe -r
ohci1394 is blocked as long as the sbp2 driver is in touch with a
FireWire drive.

I added this at some point because of unclean layering of the ieee1394
stack:  The high-level drivers video1394 and dv1394 do not only depend
on the ieee1394 core driver, but also directly on the ohci1394 low-level
driver.  Now, if somebody runs
# modprobe -r video1394
it would also remove ohci1394 if sbp2 hadn't artificially increased
ohci1394's reference count.

*However*, note that try_module_get() and module_put() don't actually do
what you asked for:  They do _not_ guarantee that the host driver gets
unbound from the MMC (or FireWire...) controller:
You can still do
# echo -n ${ID} > /sys/module/${MODULE}/drivers/${DRIVER}/unbind

So, if somebody asked me to copy my ieee1394/sbp2 safeguard into
firewire/fw-sbp2, I would reject that on the grounds that killing the
connection to the FireWire disk is the *expected result* of
# modprobe -r firewire-ohci
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= ---= -=-=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-10  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-09 17:07 Enrik Berkhan
2009-01-09 18:20 ` David Vrabel
2009-01-09 20:00   ` Enrik Berkhan
2009-01-10  9:49     ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2009-01-11  9:41       ` Pierre Ossman
2009-01-12 15:41         ` Enrik Berkhan
2009-01-12 17:10           ` Stefan Richter
2009-01-12 20:01             ` Enrik Berkhan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49686F0C.7030807@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --cc=Enrik.Berkhan@ge.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@csr.com \
    --cc=drzeus-mmc@drzeus.cx \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome