From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B87C433EF for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 15:18:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1352247AbiDZPVr (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2022 11:21:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46790 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1352330AbiDZPV3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2022 11:21:29 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.13]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFC7139BBC for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 08:14:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.107] ([37.4.249.94]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue106 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MlO9r-1o96hT37dt-00lkXu; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 17:12:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4971fae3-8a47-50af-dedb-aac90db90de2@i2se.com> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 17:12:56 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Raspberry Pi Sense HAT driver Content-Language: en-US To: Conor.Dooley@microchip.com, nsaenzju@redhat.com, cmirabil@redhat.com, miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, serge@raspberrypi.org, mbrugger@suse.com, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, fedora-rpi@googlegroups.com, dbauman@redhat.com, mguma@redhat.com, jsavitz@redhat.com References: <20220419205158.28088-1-cmirabil@redhat.com> <06e0138a526f1fd9fe5b18184163c1ff98f0103b.camel@redhat.com> <4719fce9-4235-f1d7-f95e-67e5a47a0968@i2se.com> <60c3e7e4-6406-ecaa-e89b-fc2d359d8d31@microchip.com> From: Stefan Wahren In-Reply-To: <60c3e7e4-6406-ecaa-e89b-fc2d359d8d31@microchip.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:oZjibNcfz/UR8WE/djzPbVyCS4HWuQukMeJ0iNh2tNMK0oa5Hqm isDi7BIZpq5sJK43wjqKEbSAb9bseLQF8+KlCNuvxsnIiuoaxPqlv/r33G9FGoJemvc7g8k XgXXvVDWa4S2BRRztNIrzc6VluTpxkDOW40M3pkRSN27qz7y9veD7NSKZP1JUqRi8+zDBOI J+Xrf0HpdamvH6U6gCFXg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:cHQud7lpRWo=:mZn+loQ/xCkyhk7qc80tuj NXMqg0HJs4KMcSwbs7lambwls8OhmLVVt0oCnEXbcvtNI0d+0twEI2AvI9ojWi+m3lmwXkCJm nkacOM+Z+NP/0i5sQ8T5PxYaUu6jUdfE7pXSp+dc6wdgBTDZStDoAgm7307hwnGyQU2veQi1O vPTmLO3EVc8TJbee1YYAZDkL+cqrWAHLp20jQ8XWpb6mw9zaELH8q3tZcOBYc5t0BrQ1Qha7f A3mI82LI2tRlfxu39FtCOBOO/9zKB2kr0J0fqTwFMHz4Y/SWDRMz8TYNM3u6XLO+W3pZtcqKG SmaDTh1W9/kbp4TLIPERmak/s10pvJYsCbDcgjKbazM4SXP9ZmJNlVLtIWxqDM9legYydZ5U+ SIDgMSjLDuBkrWsrW+4aeqHWdMON0rlUCO9OqHBB2nABleP1+zL75KhC3E7Bc2DxB3GzY9gBl 29bqSqkiMkOuLEComqQ69ibtLtiOFJlGDuO4SO+HsuC1zO3KaeKBGumBi5dOtQMmyo9WEmtuu mAba9IbHOiE4122n0D3UPxFKLtY4wZImwZsUl98B0VHL9iN7/0noNWom2ZC9g+PncnJX6Fle0 42rUstN133QbZW0cAmMLXvp4nKiTrXUVr8DnWbykyRAeNDbnUO+8aoQyj4rj/zCexjdV/+IRo E+NAYbzPsR6l98iY9AaIemkxIgfkHU7k6OipuWXQrkiOO23WMNgLSi/+xRFgU+qcB4lYaWmLI 1AUPILE8CRWb4XbE Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am 26.04.22 um 14:03 schrieb Conor.Dooley@microchip.com: > On 26/04/2022 12:48, Stefan Wahren wrote: >> Am 26.04.22 um 12:18 schrieb Nicolas Saenz Julienne: >>> Hi Charles, Miguel, >>> >>> On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 19:34 -0400, Charles Mirabile wrote: >>>> Hi Miguel— >>>> >>>> Thanks for your help in reviewing this patch. I think all of the feedback is cleared up. >>>> >>>> I am not sure which tree this should go into, but maybe the Raspberry Pi tree maintained >>>> by Nicolas Saenz Julienne (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nsaenz/linux- >>>> rpi.git)? What do you think? Thanks! >>> Since there is no code dependency between the different drivers/patches I >>> suggest for each patch to go through its respective maintainer tree. Also, if >>> we were to move the whole series through as single tree, it's important to have >>> ACKs from all the subsystem maintainers. >> Yes, we still need a Ack of Rob for the device tree bindings. Please give him the common 2 weeks for a review. > You have one from Krzysztof on the bindings, that should be sufficient? > > https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainers.html#open-firmware-and-flattened-device-tree-bindings Yes, you are right > >>> I'll do a last review during the week. >>> >>> Regards, >>> > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel