mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>, David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Cc: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] hwmon: introduce hwmon_sanitize_name()
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 08:23:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4973276f-ed1e-c4ed-18f9-e8078c13f81a@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220330145137.GA214615@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>

On 3/30/22 07:51, Xu Yilun wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 10:11:39AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
>> From: Xu Yilun
>>> Sent: 30 March 2022 07:51
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 06:07:26PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
>>>> More and more drivers will check for bad characters in the hwmon name
>>>> and all are using the same code snippet. Consolidate that code by adding
>>>> a new hwmon_sanitize_name() function.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
>>>> ---
>>>>   Documentation/hwmon/hwmon-kernel-api.rst |  9 ++++-
>>>>   drivers/hwmon/hwmon.c                    | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>   include/linux/hwmon.h                    |  3 ++
>>>>   3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/hwmon/hwmon-kernel-api.rst b/Documentation/hwmon/hwmon-kernel-api.rst
>>>> index c41eb6108103..12f4a9bcef04 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/hwmon/hwmon-kernel-api.rst
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/hwmon/hwmon-kernel-api.rst
>>>> @@ -50,6 +50,10 @@ register/unregister functions::
>>>>
>>>>     void devm_hwmon_device_unregister(struct device *dev);
>>>>
>>>> +  char *hwmon_sanitize_name(const char *name);
>>>> +
>>>> +  char *devm_hwmon_sanitize_name(struct device *dev, const char *name);
>>>> +
>>>>   hwmon_device_register_with_groups registers a hardware monitoring device.
>>>>   The first parameter of this function is a pointer to the parent device.
>>>>   The name parameter is a pointer to the hwmon device name. The registration
>>>> @@ -93,7 +97,10 @@ removal would be too late.
>>>>
>>>>   All supported hwmon device registration functions only accept valid device
>>>>   names. Device names including invalid characters (whitespace, '*', or '-')
>>>> -will be rejected. The 'name' parameter is mandatory.
>>>> +will be rejected. The 'name' parameter is mandatory. Before calling a
>>>> +register function you should either use hwmon_sanitize_name or
>>>> +devm_hwmon_sanitize_name to replace any invalid characters with an
>>>
>>> I suggest                   to duplicate the name and replace ...
>>
>> You are now going to get code that passed in NULL when the kmalloc() fails.
>> If 'sanitizing' the name is the correct thing to do then sanitize it
>> when the copy is made into the allocated structure.
> 
> Then the driver is unaware of the name change, which makes more
> confusing.
> 
>> (I'm assuming that the 'const char *name' parameter doesn't have to
>> be persistent - that would be another bug just waiting to happen.)
> 
> The hwmon core does require a persistent "name" parameter now. No name
> copy is made when hwmon dev register.
> 
>>
>> Seems really pointless to be do a kmalloc() just to pass a string
>> into a function.
> 
> Maybe we should not force a kmalloc() when the sanitizing is needed, let
> the driver decide whether to duplicate the string or not.
> 

Drivers can do that today, and in all existing cases they do so
(which is why I had suggested to handle the duplication in the
convenience function in the first place). Drivers don't _have_
to use the provided convenience functions. At the same time,
convenience functions should cover the most common use cases.

Michael, let's just drop the changes outside drivers/hwmon from
the series, and let's keep hwmon_is_bad_char() in the include file.
Let's just document it, explaining its use case.

Code outside drivers/hwmon can then be independently modified or not
at a later time, based on driver author and/or maintainer preference.

Thanks,
Guenter

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-30 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-29 16:07 [PATCH v2 0/5] hwmon: introduce hwmon_sanitize() Michael Walle
2022-03-29 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] hwmon: introduce hwmon_sanitize_name() Michael Walle
2022-03-30  2:57   ` David Laight
2022-03-30  3:46     ` Guenter Roeck
2022-03-30  9:20       ` David Laight
2022-03-30 13:58         ` Andrew Lunn
2022-03-30  6:50   ` Xu Yilun
2022-03-30 10:11     ` David Laight
2022-03-30 14:51       ` Xu Yilun
2022-03-30 15:23         ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2022-03-31 14:45           ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-03-31 14:51             ` Michael Walle
2022-03-31 14:58               ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-03-31 15:12                 ` Michael Walle
2022-03-31 17:11                 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-03-30 14:23   ` Guenter Roeck
2022-03-30 14:50     ` David Laight
2022-03-30 15:13       ` Guenter Roeck
2022-03-29 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] hwmon: intel-m10-bmc-hwmon: use devm_hwmon_sanitize_name() Michael Walle
2022-03-30  6:52   ` Xu Yilun
2022-03-29 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] net: sfp: use hwmon_sanitize_name() Michael Walle
2022-03-30 19:40   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-03-31 14:46   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-03-29 16:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] net: phy: nxp-tja11xx: use devm_hwmon_sanitize_name() Michael Walle
2022-03-29 16:07 ` [PATCH RFC v2 5/5] hwmon: move hwmon_is_bad_char() into core Michael Walle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4973276f-ed1e-c4ed-18f9-e8078c13f81a@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®